We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,826

Google: the benign monopolist?

  • White & Case LLP
  • -
  • Global, USA
  • -
  • November 20 2009

There is something about copyright which evokes passion

Office Depot Inc. v. Zuccarini

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2010

Office Depot obtained a judgment that the defendant’s use of the domain name offic-depot.com constituted cybersquatting and subsequently assigned the judgment to DSH

Craigslist, Inc. v. Autoposterpro, Inc., et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2009

Plaintiff Craigslist, Inc., operator of the popular Craigslist.com website, filed suit against defendants for breach of contract, inducing breach of contract, intentional interference with contractual relations, fraud, trademark infringement under state law, computer fraud and abuse, and unauthorized access of a website and computer system

New Jersey expands consumer warranty law to cover coupons

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 25 2013

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently addressed whether the Truth-In-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act (the Act) applies to online retailers

Cybersquatting update: new protections for brand owners

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 17 2011

Brand owners have recently been given new weapons in the never-ending battle against cybersquatters

Social media & employees: when every little thing is searchable

  • Dentons
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • December 9 2012

The scope of an employer’s right to discipline and terminate an employee for indiscreet or inappropriate remarks in social media is far from settled

No Fourth Amendment violation in government administrative subpoena to ISP for subscriber information

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

An administrative subpoena served upon a defendant's Internet service provider to obtain his subscriber information did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled, because the defendant had no reasonable expection of privacy in his subscriber information

The client strikes back: defamation cases in California and Virginia illustrate dangers of suing over critical internet reviews

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2013

Two recent defamation cases highlight the risks involved in suing former customers or clients for defamation based on the posting of negative online

Internet advertising patent saga continues: Supreme Court orders Federal Circuit to reconsider decision in Ultramercial v. Hulu

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2012

In a brief, one paragraph order issued on May 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court hinted that a recent decision covering patent-eligibility for medical testing methods is also relevant to Internet-based methods

Social media defamation victories assist companies in fighting reputational attacks

  • Governo Law Firm LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 9 2013

A company's reputation is often its most important asset. Damage to reputation can lead to lost customers, revenue, investors, and employees. Not