We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 166

Viacom International, Inc., et al. v. YouTube, Inc., et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2009

The court accepted YouTube’s argument that documents from third-party BayTSP, a company hired by Viacom and other content owners to identify clients’ content on the Internet and send DMCA takedown notices, are relevant to YouTube’s defense and that producing such documents does not create an undue burden on BayTSP, and granted YouTube’s motion to compel BayTSP to produce the requested documents

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2009

Defendant A9.com, Inc. operates a search engine and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amazon.com

UMG Recordings, Inc, et al v Veoh Networks, Inc, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2009

The district court dismissed claims of contributory and vicarious copyright infringement and inducement to infringe as to defendants who were investors in Veoh Networks

FTC staff issues revised principles and guidance for online behavioral advertising

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2009

In December, 2007, Federal Trade Commission staff issued proposed principles for online behavioral advertising

The Associated Press v All Headline News Corp, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2009

The Southern District of New York determined that it will hear The Associated Press’s claims that All Headline News is misappropriating “hot news,” but dismissed two of the AP’s claims against AHN

Viacom Int’l Inc, et al v YouTube, Inc, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2008

The Southern District of New York denied a motion by the plaintiffs to amend their complaint by adding a claim for punitive damages in their copyright infringement lawsuit against YouTube and Google

Louis Vuitton Malletier, SA v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc., et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2009

Jury awards trademark and copyright owner $31.5 million for contributory and vicarious trademark infringement and $900,000 for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement against defendant web site hosting companies; jury determined that defendants knew their customers were selling counterfeit goods and had the ability to disable or limit the web site hosting services that their customers were using to sell counterfeit goods but failed to do so

UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. Veoh Networks, Inc., et al.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2009

Defendant Veoh operates an Internet-based service that allows users to share videos with others

With internet “blogging” on the rise, does your business have an employee blogging policy?

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2007

Social web sites, such as MySpace.com, Facebook.com, Friendster.com, and personal web logs, popularly known as “blogs,” allow anyone with a computer to publish statements and post content on the Internet

Reinhardt v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2008

The federal district court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by Richard “Richie Ramone” Reinhardt, former member of the band the Ramones, against Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Apple Inc., and Real Networks Inc. and others involved in the exploitation of songs authored by members of the Ramones over digital downloads of six songs he allegedly authored while a member of the Ramones