We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 236

Circuit court split on ACA could impact employer penalties

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2014

In conflicting opinions released on July 22nd, two federal circuits split on whether Affordable Care Act subsidies are available under a federally

Determination of employer “Pay or Play” assessment under Affordable Care Act cast into doubt following recent court split

  • Trucker Huss APC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 1 2014

As employers prepare to comply with the Affordable Care Act's employer shared responsibility provision (or "Pay or Play" requirement) under Section

IRS issues draft forms for the reporting of coverage under the Affordable Care Act

  • Trucker Huss APC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 1 2014

On July 24, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") re- leased draft forms for review and comment implementing the reporting requirements under

The Affordable Care Actcountdown to compliance for employers, week 22: charting the future of the premium subsidies (and employer penalties): Halbig v. Burwell and King v. Burwell

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

On July 22, 2014, two federal appellate courts issued conflicting decisions, within hours of each other, regarding the IRS final rule published on

Circuits split regarding validity of federal subsidies of health insurance purchased on federally-established exchanges

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

Two federal appeals courts have issued opposing decisions regarding whether the IRS has the authority under the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") to extend

Charting the future of premium subsidies under the Affordable Care Act: Halbig v. Burwell and King v. Burwell

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

On July 22, 2014, two federal appellate courts issued conflicting decisions, within hours of each other, regarding the IRS final rule published on

Future of the Affordable Care Act in jeopardy in many states

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

A same-day split decision has created an uncertain future for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).Yesterday, two Circuit Courts

Halbig v Burwell: D.C. appeals court strikes Obamacare health insurance subsidies

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled, in a 2-to-1 decision, in Halbig v. Burwell that the IRS is not authorized under the Affordable

Appellate courts disagree on whether federal exchange premium subsidies are legal under ACA

  • Paul Hastings LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

Yesterday morning two US Court of Appeals issued conflicting opinions on whether the federal government may provide tax credits under the Affordable

Employers that reimburse employees' individual insurance premiums could be subject to serious penalties

  • Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

An employer that directly reimburses employees on a pre-tax basis for premiums paid by an employee for non-employer sponsored health insurance