We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Creative divorce planning: applying the QDROtic equation

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 30 2011

Tax-qualified retirement plans such as defined benefit pension plans and 401(k) plans are granted substantial tax benefits by the federal government in order to encourage private retirement savings

Second Circuit affirms district court's decision rejecting claim for refund based on claimed overvaluation of employee stock

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2011

In Gudmundsson v US, 107 AFTR 2d 107 AFTR2d 2011-456 (2nd Cir. 2011) the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed a district court decision which dismissed the taxpayers’ claim for refund in tax based on an alleged overvaluation of stock one of the spouse’s received under an incentive (employee) stock option plan where the stock subsequently precipitously fell in value

Madoff and private foundations: should the IRS follow the actions by the U.S. Department of Labor in pursuing fiduciaries?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 22 2010

On October 21, 2010 Andrew M. Harris reported on Bloomberg.com that the U.S. Department of Labor has sued four investment firms for allegedly failing to examine Madoff’s business practices before entrusting him with hundreds of millions of dollars in pension funds

Year end tax planning: setting past years' peformance bonuses: deductible business expense or disguised dividend?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 28 2009

In Menard, Inc., 560 F3d 620 (7th Cir., 2009), rev'g TC Memo 2004-207 , the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Tax Court and found in favor of the taxpayer that a large 5 bonus arrangement payment was in fact paid for services rendered and was deductible in computing the corporation's taxable income for 1998, the year in issue