We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 159

The future of premium tax credits in Federal Exchanges: the implications of Halbig and King

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2014

Within just a few hours of each other on Tuesday, July 22, 2014, two Federal Circuit courts of appeals made headline news with conflicting decisions

No delay of game Affordable Care Act (ACA) compliance efforts should continue, despite court rulings

  • Saul Ewing LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2014

Perhaps you have put your compliance efforts on the back burner, hoping the ACA will just go away. We have heard many reasons for this

Circuit courts clash over tax subsidies for health insurance purchased on federally-run exchanges

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

This is the 44th in a series of WorkCite articles concerning the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its companion statute, the Health

How big is Halbig? The potential effects of this major ruling are numerous and significant

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2014

On July 22, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued conflicting opinions on

The Affordable Care Actcountdown to compliance for employers, week 22: charting the future of the premium subsidies (and employer penalties): Halbig v. Burwell and King v. Burwell

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

On July 22, 2014, two federal appellate courts issued conflicting decisions, within hours of each other, regarding the IRS final rule published on

Appellate courts split on validity of key ACA regulation

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

In two important decisions issued July 22, 2014, both addressing the validity of a key regulation promulgated under the Patient Protection and

Dueling court cases issued on same day

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

On Tuesday morning the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that an IRS rule for a key piece of the 2010 Affordable Care

U.S. appeals courts issue conflicting decisions on whether ACA permits tax subsidies of health care coverage purchased through federal exchanges

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

On July 22, 2014, three-judge panels of the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Fourth Circuits issued conflicting decisions

Circuit court split casts doubt on PPACA subsidies for individuals and employer penalties in 36 states

  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

Two federal appeals courts issued conflicting rulings on July 22 on whether individual premium subsidies under the Patient Protection and Affordable

Courts issue conflicting rulings on ACA subsidies

  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has always faced tremendous challenges due to the sheer magnitude of both the changes it