Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 11-20 of 20
APA amendments cause extension of Rule 260.204.9 comment period
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 8 2012
Last December, I wrote this post concerning the Commissioner’s proposed amendments to Rule 260.204.9
The first fork limited versus open qualification
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- November 30 2011
As most securities lawyers know, California requires that the offer and sale of securities in an issuer transaction must be qualified unless the security or transaction is exempt or not subject to qualification
CalPERS considers revisions to global governance principles
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 23 2011
At a meeting last week, the Policy Subcommittee of the Investment Committee of CalPERS’ Board of Administration considered amendments to CalPERS’ Global Principles of Corporate Governance
Court of Appeal decides buy-out questions under Re-RULPA
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 28 2011
California’s Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, commonly known as Re-RULPA, established a mechanism by which partners can avoid a judicial dissolution of the partnership by purchasing for cash the partnership interest owned by the partners initiating the judicial dissolution proceeding
Why corporations receive shareholder proposals
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 20 2011
Recently, I spoke at an ”essentials” program presented by the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals
Nevada Supreme Court addresses delivery of dissenters’ rights notices
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 13 2011
Last week, the Nevada Supreme Court answered the question of whether notice of dissenters’ rights must be delivered to both stockholders of record and beneficial owners
At the PCAOB, they give no words but “mum”
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 20 2011
In March, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board issued its first public research note
Are reverse mergers a Nevada problem?
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 10 2011
Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued this bulletin on the risks of investing in reverse merger companies
California's 5090 rule - when being in control may mean that you're not
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 19 2011
Many out-of-state practitioners are surprised to learn that California has special statutory provisions governing a merger when a constituent corporation (Section 161) or its parent (Section 175) owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50 of the voting power (Section 194.5) of the other constituent corporation prior to the merger
Non-competition contract doesn't vitiate agents' duty of loyalty
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 5 2011
California has codified various legal and equitable maxims in its Civil Code
Current Search
- Jurisdiction - USA
- Workarea - Corporate Finance/M&A
- Author - Keith P. Bishop