We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
On April 27, 2010, in a 5-3 ruling, the Supreme Court held that an arbitration agreement that was silent as to whether it provided for class arbitration could not be construed to require the parties to submit to class arbitration
