We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

The Delaware quarterly July - September 2014

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 2 2014

Deserving particular attention this quarter are two decisions: the Delaware Supreme Court's opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Indiana Electrical

The Delaware quarterly April - June 2014

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 2 2014

The Delaware Supreme Court and Delaware Court of Chancery are generally regarded as the country's premier business courts, and their decisions carry

Contract formation and arbitration

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2012

On February 28th, the Eleventh Circuit held that when a party challenges both the formation of a contract containing an arbitration clause and the contract itself, courts must conduct a two-step analysis

Auditor cannot compel arbitration

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 27 2010

On September 22nd, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the trial court's denial of an auditor's motion to compel arbitration

Lehman bondholders make end run

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2010

On April 20th, the district court overseeing the Lehman Brothers securities and ERISA litigation refused to stay a significant part of a FINRA arbitration brought by a purchaser of Lehman bonds and filed against Richard S. Fuld Jr., the former CEO and Chairman of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., and its broker-dealer, Lehman Brothers, Inc

Bills would limit mandatory arbitration clauses

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 24 2011

On October 18th, the Los Angeles Times reported on S. 987, the Arbitration Fairness Act, which would make consumer, employment, and civil rights arbitration agreements unenforceable, and S. 1652, the Consumer Mobile Fairness Act, which would make arbitration agreements in cell phone contracts unenforceable