We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-15 of 15

Delaware Supreme Court enforces consent to settle clause and precludes coverage

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2009

The Supreme Court of Delaware, applying Missouri law, has held that an insurer acted in good faith in objecting to a settlement reached at a mediation that it did not attend pursuant to an agreement with the insured

Court holds defense costs outside policy limits

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2010

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, applying California law, has affirmed an arbitration ruling that defense costs paid by an insurer on behalf of an insured under a business management and indemnity policy did not erode the policy’s $1 million limit of liability

No coverage for breach of contract claims

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 14 2013

A federal district court, applying Florida law, has held that a loan company was not entitled to coverage under an errors and omissions policy for

Declaratory judgment action dismissed due to insureds’ failure to comply with ADR clause

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 21 2012

Applying California law, the United States District Court for the Central District of California has dismissed a declaratory judgment action on the grounds that the insureds failed to comply with policy conditions requiring the insureds to pursue alternative dispute resolution prior to filing a judicial proceeding

Claimant is collaterally estopped from asserting that arbitration award triggers coverage under lawyers professional liability policy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2010

The Court of Appeals of North Carolina has held that a claimant is collaterally estopped from asserting that an arbitration award triggers coverage under an insured's lawyers professional liability policy where the arbitration award found the insured liable solely in his capacity as a fund manager