We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 86,410

“Particularly heinous” immigration fraud amounts to unauthorized practice

  • Kegler Brown Hill + Ritter
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

The Supreme Court ordered Mary E. Hernandez of Cincinnati to stop engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and pay $15,000 in civil penalties as

Public nuisance claims displaced by CERCLA

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

In a case of first impression, the Eastern District of Washington recently ruled in Anderson, et al., v. Teck Metals, Ltd. CV-13-420-LRS that CERCLA

Supreme Court holds findings of fact require deference

  • FB Rice
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court has held that an “appellate court Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit must apply a 'clear error,' not de

Illinois court issues corrected opinion on expenses being included in reinsurance limit

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

As we previously reported, an Illinois appellate court recently concluded that the limit stated on certain reinsurance certificates applied to both

Supreme Court calls for some deference in claim construction standard of review

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

On January 20, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., finding that the Federal Rules of Civil

First CBM claims survive review, first contested Motions to Amend granted-in-part

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

December was a big monthand an interesting way to end 2015at the PTAB. As our updated statistics show, claims have finally survived CBM review, and

Who decides whether new claims are precluded by old arbitration? An arbitrator, says 2d circuit

  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

We all know that the doctrines of issue preclusion (collateral estoppel) and claim preclusion (res judicata) apply with equal force to both

NJ Supreme Court considers breadth of state whistleblower protections for “watchdog” employees

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

The New Jersey Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday, January 20, in the closely watched case, Lippman v. Ethicon, Inc., addressing the scope

U.S. Supreme Court revises standard for appellate review of patent claim construction decisions

  • Cooley LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

On January 20, 2015, the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., No. 13-854, 574 U.S.__ (2015

A bank or not a bank? MoneyGram fails to meet the test in U.S. Tax Court

  • Roetzel & Andress
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

MoneyGram International Inc., (MoneyGram) the world's second-largest money transfer company, lost its bid before the U.S. Tax Court (the Court) to