We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 11,702

6th circuit: excess insurance triggered by primary’s refusal to defend

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

When a primary insurer improperly refused to provide coverage, an excess insurer should have stepped in, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court recently ruled

“Insured v. insured” exclusion in D&O policy doesn’t preclude coverage to bank execs for FDIC suit

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • Puerto Rico, USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico held that a D&O policy's "insured v. insured" exclusion did not foreclose coverage

Washington Supreme Court rules that it was error to delay adjudication of insurer's duty to defend, but should stay discovery as to insurer's coverage defenses

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The Washington Supreme Court handed down two holdings that should significantly benefit policyholders. Recognizing that a duty to defend is

Insured person under CGL policy did not include supervisory employee

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

Applying a limited reading of an insured's policy providing coverage for "directors," the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a

Sixth Circuit clarifies scope of Medicare Secondary Payer liability for non-group health plans

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

On July 16, 2014, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that a "health care provider can bring the Medicare Secondary Payer Act's ("MSP's"

ERISA (8th Circuit): over-the-counter vitamin supplements trigger pre-existing condition exclusion

  • Lane Powell PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2014

Here’s the case of Kutten v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, __ F.3d __, 2014 WL 3562784 (8th Cir. July 21, 2014) (pdf). FACTS: Kutten had a

Federal district court upholds foreign reinsurer’s right to remove action to federal court

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

The Court for the Middle District of Louisiana upheld a magistrate's ruling denying a motion to remand filed by the Louisiana Commerce and Trade

Terrorism Risk Insurance Legislation advances, but obstacles remain

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

As Congress wraps up its work in 2014, a top business community priority is reauthorization of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA). TRIA became

South Carolina decision on allocation of defense costs creates a trap for the responsive insurer

  • Nelson Levine de Luca & Hamilton LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

A recent decision by the U.S. District Court in South Carolina confirms the state's position as an outlier when it comes to whether an insurer that

The Affordable Care Actcountdown to compliance for employers, week 22: charting the future of the premium subsidies (and employer penalties): Halbig v. Burwell and King v. Burwell

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

On July 22, 2014, two federal appellate courts issued conflicting decisions, within hours of each other, regarding the IRS final rule published on