We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 14,507

EPA revisions to definition of “solid waste” change the regulatory landscape for hazardous recyclable materials

  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 19 2014

On December 10, 2014, the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA" or the "Agency") signed a final rule revising the

EPA regulates coal combustion residuals as solid waste and retains exclusions for beneficial use

  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 19 2014

Today EPA issued a final rule regulating coal combustion residuals (CCR) as solid waste under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery

Every picture tells a story... Convincing regulators and courts of your client’s position

  • Pepper Hamilton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

When facing the potential of spending large sums of money on remediation, administrative enforcement, or litigation due to a chemical release to the

What now? Why Maryland's decision to recognize the International Green Construction Code may signal a major shift in the means utilized to implement green construction requirements

  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

There is little doubt that the U.S. Green Building Council (the “Council”) and its established Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED

How low will it go? EPA’s proposal to lower ozone limit may leave many counties in nonattainment

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

On Oct. 6, 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court denied an industry group's petition challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 2008 decision to

District court limits tiering of biological opinions

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

On December 5, 2014, a federal district court held that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) failed to comply with the Endangered Species Act

New York bans hydraulic fracturing

  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

The ban comes in light of a report from the New York State Department of Health claiming there is insufficient information to understand the health

Update: accepting a permit “under protest” does not work in the coastal zone

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

In our October issue, we reported on the Lynch v. California Coastal Commission (2014) 229 Cal. App. 4th 658 decision, which held that homeowners who

Court applies low standard to file a CEQA challenge

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

In order to file a CEQA challenge, a petitioner is required under CEQA (Public Resources Code 21177) to object to the approval of the project and

San Diego regional sustainable strategies plan invalidated; SANDAG has requested Supreme Court review

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

The Court of Appeal departed from prior decisions and held that the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prejudicially abused its discretion