We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 12,123

Conflict minerals resource center

  • Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

On August 22, 2012, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Rule 13p-1 under the Exchange Act, which is known as the "Conflict Minerals

Conflict minerals rule weekly recap 73 April 4, 2014

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

On April 7, 2014, the SEC issued a second set of FAQs on the conflict minerals rule which is presented as Frequently Asked Questions 13-21. Most of

Appellate Court issues opinion on Conflict Minerals Rule portions of District Court decision affirmed and portions reversed

  • Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

Midday today, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued its opinion in the challenge to the Conflict Minerals Rule. With one exception, the

Appeals court opinion changes conflict minerals rules compliance landscape

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

On Monday, April 14, 2014, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (the DC Circuit) struck down part of the federal rules

OSHA adopts changes to electric power generation, transmission, and distribution rules nine years after proposed rulemaking

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

After nearly nine years since its proposed rulemaking began, including substantial controversy, hearings, and public comments, OSHA has finally

Manufacturer's corner: SEC's final rule on conflict minerals partially stricken by D.C. Circuit

  • Spencer Fane Britt & Browne
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

We break from our ongoing series on implied warranties to notify you of a recent opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Legal challenge review of the docket “not conflict free” product description requirement violates First Amendment

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

As you recall, shortly after the SEC issued the Conflict Minerals Rule, several trade groups challenged the rule in federal court. The trade groups

Newly formed Columbus Energy Review Committee will determine if energy aggregation is right for the city

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2014

On Thursday, Columbus Mayor Michael B. Coleman and City Council President Andrew J. Ginther jointly announced the formation of a new six-member

US allowed to intervene in Rio Grande Compact dispute between Texas and New Mexico

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • Mexico, USA
  • -
  • April 11 2014

On March 31, the US Supreme Court granted the federal government's petition to intervene in a dispute between Texas and New Mexico over certain terms

Conflict minerals Q&A: important questions for companies preparing conflict minerals filings

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • Democratic Republic of Congo, USA
  • -
  • April 10 2014

As the deadline for submission of a company's Form SD draws closer, we continue to field questions from clients hitting on important concepts