We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 244,738

Teva Pharmaceuticals: is it time to rethink how you will argue claim construction?

  • Dickinson Wright PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2015

The United States Supreme Court decided in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. that the Federal Circuit must review all subsidiary factual

Worthless Services investigations and settlements: the enforcement trend continues

  • Ober Kaler
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2015

In recent years, state and federal governments have shown their willingness to criminally pursue skilled nursing home owners and operators for

Four approaches and counting: the circuit split on “mooting”

  • Vedder Price PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

By now, most attorneys who handle class action litigation are familiar with the defense strategy commonly known as "mooting."(This terminology is

Once invalid, always invalid: the Federal Circuit clarifies application of issue preclusion

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Clarifying the application of issue preclusion in the context of patent invalidity, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explained that

No acquiescence defense in Fifth Circuit without significant investment in reliance

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Clarifying that undue prejudice is a distinct requirement of the acquiescence defense, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the

Chuck Yeager’s latest suit pulls out of nose dive

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Over the years, well-known aviation figure and retired United States Air Force general, Charles E. “Chuck” Yeager (Yeager) has been engaged in

No collateral estoppel in subsequent case where decision in earlier case subject to multiple possible theories

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Addressing the applicability of the collateral estoppel doctrine, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that there was no

Luck runs out for Lucky Brand

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Addressing whether a trademark holder’s victory in a prior lawsuit barred a subsequent action on new acts of infringement, the U. S. Court of Appeals

Claims must be limited to financial activities to be covered business methods

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Narrowing the application of Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review, in two recent cases, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board

Creative interpretation of abandonment cannot save patent

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Addressing a request for adverse judgment by the patent owner, the U.S Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or