We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Identifying and resolving fraud and corruption cases in the US and the UK: part V (settlement & plea agreements)

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • September 9 2011

The SEC and DOJ regularly enter into binding settlement and plea agreements to resolve fraud and corruption matters in both civil and criminal contexts

Identifying and resolving fraud and corruption cases in the US and the UK: Part IV (deferred and non-prosecution agreements)

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • September 2 2011

In order to entice corporates to voluntarily disclose instances of fraud and corruption, meaningfully cooperate with government investigations, andor undertake remedial measures, the US Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission will, in appropriate circumstances, enter into Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) and Non-Prosecution Agreements (NPAs) with corporations

Identifying and resolving fraud and corruption cases in the US and the UK: Part II (self reporting )

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • August 19 2011

The SEC and DOJ have long encouraged corporates to voluntarily disclose possible violations of the law

Identifying and resolving fraud and corruption cases in the US and the UK: Part I

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • August 12 2011

To say regulators in the US and UK have traditionally used different tools to ferret out and punish fraud and corruption is a considerable understatement