We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,875

New York City Council passes Act requiring mandatory paid sick leave

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

On May 8, 2013, the New York City Council, by a 45-3 vote, passed the New York City Earned Sick Time Act which will require employers with 20 or more

New appellate decision applies Brinker to require certification of certain meal and rest claims

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

On Friday afternoon, the Fourth Appellate District, Division 3 (Orange County) decided Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates (Faulkinbury II). This was a

California Court of Appeal allows injunction under unfair competition law to prevent horizontal competitor from diverting business through unlawful means

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

For many years, California's Unfair Competition Law had no traditional standing requirements. But since the passage of Proposition 64 in 2004

California TEA designations shift in policy

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

The California Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) held a conference call on May 6th to discuss investment in California

Ninth Circuit holds that federal securities laws preempt California Labor Code's ban on forced patronage at brokerage firms

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

In McDaniel v. Wells Fargo Investments, LLC, Nos. 11-17017, 11-55859, 11-55943, 11-55958, 2013 WL 1405949 (9th Cir. Apr. 9, 2013), the United States

New “beast” rules lessen the export control burden

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

On April 16, 2013, the U.S. Departments of State and Commerce published the first in a series of final rules, amending the International Traffic in

$8 million penalty for weak ITAR compliance: how the price of maintenance beats the cost of repair

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

On April, 30, 2013, Raytheon Company, a major military electronics and weapons manufacturer, agreed with the U.S. Department of State to pay $8

U.S. sanctions target Russian corruption, human rights violations

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • Russia, USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

Asserting that "the protection of human rights is not left exclusively to the internal affairs of any one country," in December 2012 the

OFAC gets hot, bothered on Iran and Cuba: how economic sanctions work today

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • Cuba, Iran, USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

People who practice U.S. economic sanctions law like to talk about how sanctions are policy-oriented, or an engine of U.S. foreign policy. Whereas

District Court grants motion to compel against SEC, holding that "facts" are not work product in SEC confidential witness interviews

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

In a recent Securities & Exchange Commission ("SEC") investigation, the SEC interviewed three persons who had proffer agreements with the SEC and

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy