We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 33

No broker-customer relationship absent a direct connection to investment-related services provided by the brokerage firm

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 14 2013

A Utah federal district court is the latest to join the chorus of opinions holding that a would-be arbitration claimant cannot proceed with a FINRA

Supreme Court modifies class certification procedure in securities fraud class actions

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 25 2014

On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its second decision in the long-running securities fraud class action against Halliburton (Halliburton II

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York gives priority to forum selection clause over prior arbitration agreement

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2012

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York recently held that a forum selection clause giving New York state and federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over disputes between two parties would supplant the parties’ prior arbitration agreement based on the parties’ status as FINRA members

Morrison v. National Australia Bank

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 19 2010

The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the Morrison v. National Australia Bank case will limit securities claims by investors who bought shares in non-U.S. companies on foreign exchanges

Georgia Court of Appeals affirms dismissal of “holder claim”

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2012

In the recent decision of Anderson v. Daniel, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of securities misrepresentation claims because they were “holder claims” and the complaint did not allege “specific reliance” on “direct, face-to-face or telephone misrepresentations”; the “publicly disseminated” misrepresentations allegedly relied upon by plaintiffs did not suffice

Takeaways from Del. High Court's MFW ruling

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2014

Law360, New York (March 18, 2014, 9:55 PM ET) -- In a significant case of first impression, the Delaware Supreme Court, in Kahn v. M&F Worldwide Corp

U.S. District Court in Atlanta rules against the SEC in an insider trading case, describing the SEC's evidence as 'overreaching' and 'self-serving'

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2014

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lost an insider trading case last week in federal court in the Northern District of Georgia. SEC v

The Netherlands as an alternative forum for cross border class settlements and the potential consequences for claims by ‘foreign cubed’ plaintiffs under U.S. securities laws

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • Netherlands, USA
  • -
  • January 12 2010

In any litigation, and particularly in disputes regarding mass claims, there are times when various settlement options have to be considered

SEC weighs in on Intercontinental Regional Center Trust of Chicago (IRCTC)

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 11 2013

On Wednesday, February 6, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Comission (SEC) brought a civil action alleging a myriad of SEC violations against A

Supreme Court preview: securities law cases on the docket

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2009

With the arrival of the first Monday in October, the Supreme Court begins its new Term