We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 249

Indiana Court of Appeals upholds trial victory for Taft client in environmental contamination suit

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2015

In a case that examines the limits of liability for environmental cleanup costs under Indiana’s Environmental Legal Action Statute (“ELA”), the

Parent corporation’s prior assertions of domination create “alter ego” scenario, opens door for indirect successor liability under CERCLA

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

In Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. v. TCI Pacific Comm. Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00252-CVE-PJC (N.D. Ok., Feb. 2, 2015), the U.S. District Court for the Northern

Burlington Northern Limits on “arranger” liability bleed into California statutory law

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

In 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion that fundamentally changed the scope of liability for "arrangers" under the federal Comprehensive

Sixth Circuit rules Clean Water Act’s permit shield can protect general permit holders from liability

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 16 2015

The 6th Circuit recently ruled that facilities holding a Clean Water Act (“CWA”) Section 402 general permit one of two types of National Pollutant

Seventh Circuit applies Indiana choice of law rules to deny insurance coverage for contamination at an Indiana manufacturing facility

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2015

Hoosier land owners sleep well at night knowing that they are insured against liability for environmental contamination because Indiana does not

Multi-million dollar insurance bad faith claim in environmental contamination case affirmed on appeal

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

An environmental contamination case resulting in a $3.4 million award for emotional distress and punitive damages due to unfair claims settlement

Environmental due diligence needed for commercial real estate

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2015

Having a properly conducted Phase I Environmental Site Assessment when purchasing or otherwise acquiring commercial real estate can mean the

Public nuisance claims displaced by CERCLA

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

In a case of first impression, the Eastern District of Washington recently ruled in Anderson, et al., v. Teck Metals, Ltd. CV-13-420-LRS that CERCLA

Court rules CERCLA displaces federal common law claims for public nuisance

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

In a case of first impression, the Eastern District of Washington recently ruled in Anderson, et al., v. Teck Metals, Ltd. CV-13-420-LRS that CERCLA

Can landlords with knowledge of tenant’s pollution be liable for cleanup under Indiana’s Environmental Legal Action statute?

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2014

A recent ruling by the Indiana Court of Appeals could expand liability under Indiana's Environmental Legal Action statute ("ELA"). The ruling in JDN