We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 11

SCOTUS to review decision invalidating CSPAR

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 25 2013

EPA's petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the D.C. Circuit's decision invalidating the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

Supreme Court overrules EPA “strong-arming” under Clean Water Act

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2012

The United States Supreme Court recently held that an enforcement order issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) under the Clean Water Act (the “Act”) constituted “final agency action” and that the Act did not preclude judicial review of the order

Indiana Supreme Court requires insurers to pay for environmental cleanup

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2012

The Indiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flexdar, Inc. on March 22, 2012

Indiana's Supreme Court considers liability for environmental contamination

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2011

On April 7, 2011, the Indiana Supreme Court issued two important orders regarding environmental law and insurance coverage

Insurers uphill fight on coverage in Indiana

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2011

In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals provided insurance companies doing business in Indiana with guidance on how to draft pollution exclusion clausesprovisions typically included in commercial general liability ("CGL") policies that seek to exclude coverage for claims based on environmental contamination

Indiana’s Environmental Legal Action (“ELA”) statute of limitations: 6 years or 10?

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2011

Indiana's Environmental Legal Action ("ELA") statute creates a cause of action to recover costs paid to remediate environmental contamination

Indiana’s Environmental Legal Action statute: court interpretations

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 8 2011

Indiana's Environmental Legal Action statute (the "ELA") allows plaintiffs to bring an environmental legal action against a person that caused or contributed to the release of a hazardous substance or petroleum to recover reasonable costs of cleaning up the contamination

Indiana Court of Appeals clarifies landlord liability for toxic torts

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2010

On November 24, 2010, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in Neal v. Cure

The scope of an environmental professional’s negligence clarified?

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2010

Imagine that you are an environmental professional who has been retained by a purchaser to perform environmental due diligence on an unremarkable piece of commercial property

Seventh Circuit upholds Indiana’s pollution exclusion jurisprudence

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2010

Indiana is known for the tough standards it imposes on insurance companies with respect to withholding coverage based on policy exclusions