We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 500

Privileged or not? Reevaluating the "primary purpose" of communications in Internal investigations

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2014

On March 6, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a ruling that challenged traditional norms regarding the

Dot your I's and cross your T's on Ohio's Prompt Pay Act

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2014

Ohio's Prompt Pay Act has real teeth. If a higher-tier contractor is paid for work done by a lower tier and does not pay that lower tier within ten

United States Supreme Court keeps insurance company from seeking recovery of payments under CERCLA claim

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2014

The United States Supreme Court recently refused to review a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision barring an insurer's attempt to seek recovery

New developments in deferral of income for home builders

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2014

An important victory for residential builders who wish to defer recognition of project income was recently reported. In Shea Homes Inc. et al. V

Ohio peer review, telemedicine, and hospital admissions bills effective May 20, 2014

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2014

Governor Kasich recently signed into law two health care-related bills that will take effect on May 20, 2014: Ohio House Bill 123 ("HB 123") and Ohio

Pleading requirements for CERCLA Section 112(c) subrogation claims clarified

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2014

The Eastern District of California recently examined the sufficiency of an insurer's complaint for subrogation against two potentially responsible

Court clarifies pleadings requirements for CERCLA Section 112(c) subrogration claims

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2014

The Eastern District of California recently examined the sufficiency of an insurer's complaint for subrogation against two potentially responsible

In Apple’s healthcare play, will BYOD bring your own data?

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 22 2014

By now, most interested observers are well aware of historical growth in the bring your own device (BYOD) movement, in which businesses permit their

Google, Apple and mobile medical apps

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2014

Like a lot of people, we are really excited about the advances in mobile technology and how they can be applied in the healthcare environment to

If you think things are tight, you’re right

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2014

Last year marked the fourth straight annual decline in federal contracting, the longest trend of decline since 1986. The value of prime contracts