We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Patsy’s: food fight!

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 2 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the District Court’s decision that neither Patsy’s Italian Restaurant nor Patsy’s Pizzeria, located in New York City, has exclusive rights to the name PATSY’S

Louboutin request for preliminary injunction against Yves Saint Laurent America denied

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2011

As previously discussed here Christian Louboutin S.A. (“Louboutin”) sought a preliminary injunction to prevent Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. (“YSL”) from marketing any shoes that use the same or a confusingly similar shade of red as that protected by its trademarked red-sole footwear

ITC issues notice of final determination finding violation and general exclusion order in Certain Protective Cases (337-TA-780)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2012

On October 31, 2012, the International Trade Commission (“the Commission”) issued a notice finding a violation of Section 337, and determining that a general exclusion order and several cease and desist orders should issue in Certain Protective Cases and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-780

Federal Circuit affirms ITC’s final determination in Bourdeau Bros. Appeal (2012-1262)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 27 2013

On February 20, 2013, a Federal Circuit panel consisting of Judges Newman and Lourie as well as Chief Judge Leonard Davis of the U.S. District Court