Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 13
Federal Circuit affirms ITC’s final determination in Bourdeau Bros. Appeal (2012-1262)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 27 2013
On February 20, 2013, a Federal Circuit panel consisting of Judges Newman and Lourie as well as Chief Judge Leonard Davis of the U.S. District Court
ALJ Gildea grants joint motions to terminate investigation in certain motion-sensitive sound effects devices and image display devices (337-TA-773)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 17 2011
On October 13, 2011, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public versions of Order Nos. 51 and 52 in Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-773
ALJ Rogers rules on motion to reopen the record in Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices (337-TA-741749)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 26 2011
On September 22, 2011, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 28C in Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Including Monitors, Televisions, and Modules, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-741749
ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-807) regarding Certain Digital Photo Frames And Image Display Devices
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 23 2011
On September 21, 2011, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a press release announcing that it voted to institute an investigation of Certain Digital Photo Frames And Image Display Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-807
ITC decides to review Initial Determination in Certain Electronic Devices With Image Processing Systems (337-TA-724)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 7 2011
On September 2, 2011, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued a notice determining to review an Initial Determination (“ID”) issued by ALJ E. James Gildea on July 1, 2011 finding a violation of Section 337 in Certain Electronic Devices With Image Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-724
ALJ Essex sets target date in certain universal serial bus (“USB”) portable storage devices, including USB flash drives (337-TA-788)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 6 2011
Further to our July 15, 2011 post, on September 1, 2011, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 4: Setting the Target Date and Date for Submission of Proposed Procedural Schedule in Certain Universal Serial Bus (“USB”) Portable Storage Devices, Including USB Flash Drives and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-788
ITC institutes Investigation (337-TA-804) regarding Certain LED Photographic Lighting Devices
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 3 2011
On August 31, 2011, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a press release announcing that it voted to institute an investigation of Certain LED Photographic Lighting Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-804
ALJ Rogers grants motion to terminate investigation in certain gemcitabine (337-TA-766)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 17 2011
On August 16, 2011, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 15 (dated August 16, 2011) in Certain Gemcitabine and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-766
ALJ Rogers sets Procedural Schedule in Certain Coenzyme Q10 Products (337-TA-790)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 17 2011
Further to our July 15, 2011 and July 26, 2011 posts, on August 15, 2011, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 6: Setting Procedural Schedule in Certain Coenzyme Q10 Products and Methods of Making Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-790
HTC files new 337 complaint regarding certain electronic devices with communication capabilities
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 17 2011
On August 16, 2011, HTC Corp. of Taiwan (“HTC”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337
