We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 477

Hurricane Alice: the broad impact of the Supreme Court’s software patent decision

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 15 2014

Reactions to the Supreme Court's CLS Bank v. Alice decision were mixed on both sides of the debate. Everyone seemed to agree that software patents

Alleged seeding of copyrighted material on BitTorrent is not copyright misuse

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

Judge Kennelly granted in part plaintiff Malibu Media’s motion to dismiss Doe defendant’s counterclaim and certain of its nineteen affirmative

Stay pending inter partes review warranted by plaintiff’s delay in filing suit

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2014

Judge Holderman granted defendant Pacific Marketing International’s (“PMI’s”) motion to stay plaintiff Ignite USA’s patent litigation case pending the

Permissible repair doctrine applies where patentee recommends changing the accused part

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2014

Judge Grady denied defendants’ (collectively “Trico”) motion for summary judgment of noninfringement with respect to Trico’s Duralast Flex Blade

Octane Fitness may require a summary judgment motion for an exceptional case findings

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2014

Federal Circuit Judge Dyk, sitting by designation in the E.D. Texas, recently denied a 35 USC Section 285 exceptional case motion in Stragent, LLC v

Claim differentiation informs claim construction

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

Judge Pallmeyer construed the claims in this patent infringement case involving an IV form N-acetylcysteine used for treating acetaminophen

Patent eligibility could not be decided on the pleadings

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2014

Judge Hart denied Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s patent infringement claims related to screening drivers for various

Social media alone does not create personal jurisdiction

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 13 2014

Judge Dow granted defendant WoundRight Technologies’ (“WoundRight”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in

Disturbing retail patent litigation statistics confirm what retailers already know

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2014

The following is a post by my colleague Anthony J. Fuga. Anthony and I regularly work together defending retailers against patent trolls

Not accepting well-pled allegations is “cardinal sin” of affirmative defenses

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 1 2014

Judge Shadur sua sponte struck portions of defendant iRobot’s answer and affirmative defenses, and allowed other portions to be repled. Of particular