We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 473

Octane Fitness may require a summary judgment motion for an exceptional case findings

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2014

Federal Circuit Judge Dyk, sitting by designation in the E.D. Texas, recently denied a 35 USC Section 285 exceptional case motion in Stragent, LLC v

Claim differentiation informs claim construction

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

Judge Pallmeyer construed the claims in this patent infringement case involving an IV form N-acetylcysteine used for treating acetaminophen

Patent eligibility could not be decided on the pleadings

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2014

Judge Hart denied Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s patent infringement claims related to screening drivers for various

Social media alone does not create personal jurisdiction

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 13 2014

Judge Dow granted defendant WoundRight Technologies’ (“WoundRight”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in

Disturbing retail patent litigation statistics confirm what retailers already know

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2014

The following is a post by my colleague Anthony J. Fuga. Anthony and I regularly work together defending retailers against patent trolls

Not accepting well-pled allegations is “cardinal sin” of affirmative defenses

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 1 2014

Judge Shadur sua sponte struck portions of defendant iRobot’s answer and affirmative defenses, and allowed other portions to be repled. Of particular

February 2014 retail patent litigation report

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2014

February continued the trend of reduced trolling, with indications of an uptick toward the end of the month. Repeat filers included Hawk Technology

Scheduling delay does not warrant canceling the deposition

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

Judge Cole denied plaintiff Cleversafe’s motion for a protective order and sanctions preventing the deposition of Cleversafe’s CEO. The CEO was a

“Growing trend” that bit torrent DOE defendants need not be time-related

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 25 2014

TCYK, LLC, v. Does 1-44, No. 13 C 3825, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2014) (Dow J.). Judge Dow denied various Doe defendants' motions to grant

Modifying the Innovation Act to selectively target the patent troll problem

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 22 2014

The following is a blog post by Varun Shah, Aruba Network's Director, Intellectual Property full disclosure, I previously represented Aruba