We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,584

US Supreme Court to consider ERISA’s tracing requirements

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

On March 30, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would review Bd. of Trustees of Nat. Elevator Indus. Health Ben. Plan v. Montanile, 593 F. App'x 903

U.S. Supreme Court announces new standard for pregnancy discrimination claims

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2015

On Wednesday the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), which involves a claim of

Third Congressional proposal to define insider trading

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2015

On March 25, 2015, U.S. Representative Jim Himes introduced the Insider Trading Prohibition Act. The bill is the latest in a series of efforts to

Plan administrator’s “second plan interpretation” violates anti-cutback rule

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

The Third Circuit held that a plan administrator's plan interpretation requiring an actuarial reduction of certain employees' pension benefits

Cloud storage company grounded in D. Mass

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2015

A patent defendant specializing in "virtual" database systems recently learned how real its burden is when seeking to transfer out of the District of

The stakes in your TTAB opposition proceeding just went way up: Trademark Trial and Appeal Board "likelihood of confusion" determinations may have preclusive effect in contemporaneous or later-filed infringement actions

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2015

Yesterday the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. et al., case number 13-352, 575 U

Hawaii Supreme Court says employer failed to establish “rational relationship” between applicant’s drug conviction and position sought

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

Hawaii, like some other states, only permits employers to consider convictions that bear a "rational relationship to the duties and responsibilities

Ninth Circuit rules beneficiary designation forms are not documents and Instruments governing the plan

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

In Becker v. Mays-Williams, 13-35069-cv, 2015 WL 348872 (9th Cir. Jan 28, 2015), the Ninth Circuit - in a matter of first impression - concluded that

Supreme Court clarifies liability for statements of opinion in registration statements

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that a statement of opinion in a registration statement cannot be actionable as a misstatement of fact under 11

U.S. District Court rules that float income earned by Fidelity is not a plan asset

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

Four class actions were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts challenging whether float income earned on monies