We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

How is an Illinois trust now like a fine wine? It can be decanted: a summary of the new Illinois decanting statute

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

Effective January 1, 2013, Illinois statute authorizes "decanting" of irrevocable trusts. What is decanting, you ask? Isn't that something you do

Almost final isn’t final: the fact that divorce was nearly final does not prevent spouse from inheriting in Illinois case

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2013

The Illinois Appellate Court in In re Estate of Doman issued a ruling on October 11, 2012 that once more clarifies why it is important to have a Will and

More on Astrue v. Capato

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2012

As we told you a couple of weeks ago, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Astrue v. Capato, ruling that Robert Capato’s posthumously-born twins were not entitled to receive Social Security survivors benefits as his children

U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding social security benefits for children conceived after parent’s death

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court today ruled in the case of Astrue v. Capato, No. 11-159, holding that children conceived after a parent’s death through the use of in vitro fertilization are not automatically entitled to survivor benefits under the Social Security law, depending, in part, on whether applicable state law would allow posthumously conceived children to inherit from a parent’s intestate estate (that is, who would inherit under state law if the parent does not have a Will