We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 106

Whistleblower’s claims against former employer survive summary judgment

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

In a case involving "several questions of first impression," the US District Court for the Southern District of New York denied summary judgment for

DOJ narrows “carve out” practice regarding corporate plea agreements

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer in charge of the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division recently announced changes to the division's

Texas district court deems arbitration agreement enforceable

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

The US District Court for the Southern District of Texas recently held that a dispute between a group of employers and a former employee should be

Seventh Circuit addresses FLSA class certification standards

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that the same standards governing Rule 23 class certification claims apply to wage-and-hour

Section 409A transition relief deadline quickly approaching

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 9 2012

As the end of the year approaches, important transition relief from penalties and excise taxes imposed by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code is about to expire

Claims for corporate indemnification and piercing the corporate veil not mutually exclusive

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 26 2012

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a district court decision holding that a plaintiff could not simultaneously seek indemnification from his corporate employer and also seek to pierce that corporation’s veil

Delaware Chancery Court holds that former employees are not indispensible parties to litigation

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2012

The Court of Chancery for the State of Delaware recently rejected an effort to dismiss an unfair competition employee raiding lawsuit against a Delaware corporation on the theory that the departing employees, who were not named as defendants, were indispensible parties to the action

SEC adopts final rules requiring listing standards for compensation committees and advisers

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 21 2012

On June 20, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a final rule that requires national securities exchanges to adopt listing standards regarding the independence of compensation committees and compensation advisers of public companies

Government may not use work product protected communications made to a cooperator

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 15 2012

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York last week sustained claims of work product privilege with respect to information the government obtained during an investigation into alleged guaranteed investment contract (GIC) rigging

New IRS regulations imposing fees upon self-insured plans and health insurance policies

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 20 2012

On April 17, the Internal Revenue Service published in the Federal Register proposed Regulations setting forth the details for the new fees imposed upon self-insured plans and health insurance policy issuers