We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 58

Invalidating a patent on a motion to dismiss is proper

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 29 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit did not find the patentee’s infringement suit to be objectively baseless, notwithstanding that the

Data-encryption is patent eligible despite not being tied to a particular machine

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2014

Addressing an argument that a data-encryption patent was directed to non-eligible subject matter because it covered an abstract idea divorced from a

The hacker who avoided a false marking claim

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s dismissal, with prejudice, of a false marking complaint, finding that the complaint failed to properly allege an “unpatented article” under 35 U.S.C. 292

Federal Circuit affirms jury verdict of invalidity based on on-sale bar and public use

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

Affirming the district court’s judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cleared Facebook of allegations of patent infringement, finding that that the patent in suit was invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) because the patentee’s product which embodied the patented subject matter was on sale and in public use more than one year before the filing of the patent

On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related

Injunction and civil contempt remedy vacated after PTO cancels claim in reexamination

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Addressing whether an injunction and civil contempt were proper after the sole claim on which the injunction was based was cancelled, the U.S. Court

Inv. No. 337-TA-773 terminated as to respondents Optoma Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc.

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2011

On September 6, 2011, ALJ E. James Gildea issued an initial determination that granted a joint motion to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing the Same, as to Respondents Optoma Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. (collectively “Optoma”

First application of Alice Corp. decision to covered business method patent review

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

In determining whether a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review should be instituted, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) referred to the

Foreign marketing materials relevant to domestic infringement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In an appeal of a lower court’s summary judgment of no infringement of four patents, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the

ALJ gildea sets procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-778

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 26 2011

On July 25, 2011, ALJ Gildea set the procedural schedule for Investigation No. 337-TA-778, Certain Equipment for Communication Networks Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points, Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same