We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 44

Data-encryption is patent eligible despite not being tied to a particular machine

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2014

Addressing an argument that a data-encryption patent was directed to non-eligible subject matter because it covered an abstract idea divorced from a

Data transaction claim not patent eligible

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a ruling designated as non-precedential, affirmed the district court finding that a claimed

An accused device is “modified” by the installation of software

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 5 2014

Revisiting the wording of claims that recite a combination of hardware and software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a

Posner to AppleMotorola: no damages, no injunction, no trial

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2012

Judge Posner (of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit), sitting by designation, derailed Apple’s and Motorola’s expected patent liability trial when he found that both parties provided insufficient evidence to support either damages or injunctive relief

New complaint filed by Furuno names Honeywell and Skyforce as proposed respondents

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 4 2011

The ITC received a new complaint on September 30, 2011 filed on behalf of Furuno Electric Co. Ltd. and Furuno USA Inc

Commission determines not to review ALJ's finding of no violation in 337-TA-717

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2011

On July 18, 2011, the Commission determined not to review ALJ Robert K

Federal Circuit clarifies entire market value rule, hypothetical negotiation date and use of settlement agreements

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 6 2012

In LaserDynamics v. Quanta Computer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned an $8.5 million lump sum jury award and remanded the case for a new trial on damages

Cost-shifting for use of an electronic document database trumped by parties’ agreement to share costs

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2011

Addressing cost-shifting awards under 28 U.S.C. 1920, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that costs for the use of an electronic document database would have been taxable absent the parties’ cost-sharing agreement

Commission institutes new investigation and assigns ALJ Rogers

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 14 2011

The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-786, Certan Integrated Circuits, Chipsets, and Products Containing the Same, Including Televisions

ALJ Luckern sets procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-774

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2011

On July 18, 2011, ALJ Luckern set a procedural schedule based on a proposed schedule jointly submitted by the parties in Certain Electronic Devices Having A Digital Television Receiver and Components Thereof, 337-TA-774