We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 183

HIPAA Omnibus Final Rule compliance date is only two months away

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2013

The compliance date for the omnibus final rule amending the privacy, security, breach notification and enforcement regulations under the Health

Initial determination terminates investigation between Spansion and Samsung based on settlement agreement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 20 2011

ALJ Rodgers granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Spansion, LLC ("Spansion") and respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("Samsung") to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement in Inv. No. 337-TA-735, Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products Containing Same

HITECH’s security breach notification requirements

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2009

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, includes significant investment in health information technology (IT) to facilitate the adoption of a nationwide health information network

Security breach notifications

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 8 2009

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) includes significant investment in health information technology to facilitate the adoption of a U.S.-wide health information network and requires HIPAA covered entities, business associates, vendors of personal health records and related entities to notify individuals when their personal health information is subject to a breach of security

New HIPAA regulations require action by group health plans

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 7 2013

Final HIPAA privacy and security regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human services will require action by group health plan

Commission determines not to review ALJ's finding of no violation in 337-TA-717

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2011

On July 18, 2011, the Commission determined not to review ALJ Robert K

Federal Circuit clarifies entire market value rule, hypothetical negotiation date and use of settlement agreements

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 6 2012

In LaserDynamics v. Quanta Computer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned an $8.5 million lump sum jury award and remanded the case for a new trial on damages

Software compilation not a trade secret under state law

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated and remanded a grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiff’s claims for misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract against defendant Sentia Group and several former employees of the plaintiff

Minding the gap: taking the step beyond regulatory compliance into effective privacy management practices

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 28 2012

As anyone who has taken a train knows, there is that moment when you must disembark, stepping from the car to the platform, traversing the threatening gap between the two

ALJ Gildea sets procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-794

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2011

On September 12, 2011, ALJ E. James Gildea set the procedural schedule in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers, Inv. No. 337-TA-794