We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-9 of 9

Protecting the attorney-client privilege: lessons learned from the Christ Hospital whistleblower case

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2010

The Christ Hospital whistleblower case in Cincinnati has made headlines for a number of reasons recently

Guidance for executive compensation in this environment

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2009

A common theme among the Obama administration, Congress, investors and regulators is that executive compensation must be refocused on different fundamentals: long-term value rather than short-term profits; financial stability; and management of risks

Executive compensation: using long-term incentive compensation plans to focus executives on the correct fundamentals

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2009

A common theme among the Obama administration, Congress, investors, and regulators is that executive compensation must refocus on different fundamentals: Long-term value rather than short-term profits; financial stability, and management of risks

Compensation by formulaic rule or by director oversight?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 27 2009

On October 22, 2009, the US Department of Treasury’s Office of Special Master for executive compensation of companies receiving TARP funds made public letters issued to seven companies (AIG, Citigroup, Bank of America, Chrysler, General Motors, GMAC, and Chrysler Financial), and the Board of Governance of the Federal Reserve issued proposed guidance on incentive compensation policies

Executive compensation issues for financial institutions: compensation committee independence and “say on pay”

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2009

Ongoing legislative and agency initiatives arising from the administration’s "Regulatory Reform Agenda" are increasingly moving toward "federalizing" corporate law and regulating the activities of management and boards in private business, even outside of the TARP recipient environment

Silencing departing lawyers: how corporate legal departments avoid restrictive covenants when hiring lawyers

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 4 2011

It is well established that lawyers, including lawyers employed by corporate legal departments, cannot enter into agreements that restrict their future ability to practice law after they leave their employment with their corporate employer

Grow Ohio: newly proposed economic development initiative reduces up-front costs to businesses

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2011

On Thursday August 25, 2011, the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) unveiled a plan called Grow Ohio that could discount a new Ohio employer’s premium by as much as 51 percent

Your surroundings may impact the composition of your board

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2011

A new paper published by the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) titled, Effects of Local Director Markets on Corporate Boards, examines how local director labor markets affect board composition and the quality of corporate governance

Conservative group backs the appeal of JobsOhio’s constitutionality to the Ohio Supreme Court

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 3 2012

ProgressOhio has found an unlikely ally the conservative group 1851 Center for Constitutional Law in its appeal of the recent ruling in favor of JobsOhio to the Ohio Supreme Court, Gongwer reports