We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 934

Supreme Court interprets employer’s pregnancy discrimination obligations

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important opinion in a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit against UPS. After UPS driver Peggy Young became

Can a business be liable for misappropriation of trade secrets of its independent contractor?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

In a federal court case pending in Illinois, Stevens v. Interactive Financial Advisors, Inc., Case No. 11 C 2223 (N.D. Ill., Feb. 24, 2015) (Kennelly

Data breaches: will any plaintiffs be left standing?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

As previously discussed here and here, standing is the current hot topic when it comes to data breach class actions. The bar for demonstrating a

Court rules EPA must conduct hearings before imposing water pollution limits

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2015

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) failed to follow state rulemaking procedures when it imposed

“Time is of the essence” finishing the work on time and what happens if the work is not finished on time

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2008

The phrase “time is of the essence” can be found in most construction contracts today, but what does it mean?

Breach of contract for failure to provide required insurance coverage

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2015

Recently in Premier Health Partners v. NBBJ, LLC, 2015-Ohio-128 (Ohio Ct. App., Montgomery County Jan. 16, 2015) the Court of Appeals held that an

Construction insurance fundamentals

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2012

"The Heiles argue that the policy exclusions relied on by State Auto do not apply here."

Civil Rule 10(d)(2): an affidavit is required, but merit is entirely optional

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 2 2011

The Affidavit of Merit requirement in Rule 10(D)(2) was introduced in 2005 to eliminate frivolous lawsuits

The AIA document B101-2007 Owner-Architect Agreement - who has rights to the instruments of service?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 29 2008

An architect is an artist

Does a TTAB decision create issue preclusion?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2015

In B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court found that administrative decisions of the U.S. Patent and Trademark