Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 31

Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 21, 2012)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
March 30 2012

Triumph Learning LLC (“Applicant”) filed use-based trademark applications for the mark COACH in various formats

Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Disney Enters., Inc., 702 F.3d 640 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 21, 2012)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
March 8 2013

For decades, Stephen Slesinger, Inc. (“Slesinger”) and certain Disney entities, including Disney Enterprises, Inc. (“Disney”), have disputed ownership

Federal Circuit affirms finding of no likelihood of confusion between Citibank marks and Capital City Bank marks

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
April 21 2011

In Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Group, Inc., No. 10-1369 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 28, 2011), the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB’s dismissal of Citigroup Inc.’s (“Citigroup”) opposition to registration of Capital City Bank Group, Inc.’s (“CCB”) CAPITAL CITY BANK marks based on a likelihood of confusion with Citigroup’s CITIBANK marks

Nike, Inc. v. Maher, Opp. No. 91188789 (TTAB Aug. 9, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
September 12 2011

Applicants applied to register the mark JUST JESU IT for various types of athletic apparel

Super Bakery, Inc. v. Benedict, Canc. No. 92047859 (TTAB Sept. 16, 2010)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
October 5 2010

Respondent failed to timely respond to Petitioner's discovery requests on multiple occasions, including in violation of two TTAB orders

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. v. Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., 685 F.3d 1046 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2012)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
September 7 2012

Societe des Produits Nestle S.A. (“Nestle”) opposed Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc.’s (“Midwestern”) intent-to-use application for the mark WAGGIN’ STRIPS for “pet food and edible pet treats” on grounds of a likelihood of confusion with and dilution of its earlier registered and used mark BEGGIN’ STRIPS for “dog snacks.”

Solid Host, NL v. Namecheap, Inc.

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
June 19 2009

The Central District of California denied defendant domain name registrar’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s cybersquatting claim related to the use of the registrar’s private-registration services by an anonymous individual who allegedly hijacked plaintiff’s domain name

Non-use of mark for nearly eight years does not constitute abandonment where owner produced substantial evidence of intent to resume use during that period

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 31 2010

In The Crash Dummy Movie, LLC v. Mattel, Inc., No. 09-1239 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 16, 2010), the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB’s decision finding that Mattel, Inc.’s (“Mattel”) nonuse of the CRASH DUMMIES and THE INCREDIBLE CRASH DUMMIES marks (collectively “CRASH DUMMIES marks”) for nearly eight years did not constitute abandonment where Mattel produced substantial evidence of its intent to resume use of the marks during that period of nonuse

Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Group, Inc

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
April 26 2011

The Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB's dismissal of Citigroup's opposition to the registration of CAPITAL CITY BANK marks based on a likelihood of confusion with Opposer's CITIBANK marks

Frito-Lay N. AM., Inc. v. Princeton Vanguard, LLC, Opp. No. 91195552, Canc. No. 92053001 (TTAB Nov. 16, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
January 25 2012

Applicant filed a motion to compel certain electronically stored information (“ESI”) from Opposer

next >