We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 43

Court rules private fund data are not public records

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 23 2013

Private equity and venture capital funds like public pension fund money but they don't necessarily like the consequences of having the government

Does the SEC’s Regulation A proposal defy Congress’ clear intent?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 20 2013

This week's announcement by the Securities and Exchange Commission that it is proposing amendments to update and expand Regulation A has attracted

CalPERS files amicus brief in titanomachy with San Bernardino

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2013

Hesiod's Theogony tells the story of the birth of the Greek gods. The first gods were not the Olympians, but the Titans (who were in turn the

If you did this, it would be fraud!

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

All fees, reimbursements, assessments, and other money or amounts charged and collected by the Department are required to be deposited into the the

Political spending disclosure bill set for first Committee hearing today

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2013

In January, I wrote about Senator Noreen Evans bill, SB 121, that would require any corporation (as defined) that has shareholders located in

Are political contributions ultra vires?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2013

It's been three years, but the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n, 558 US 50 (2010) continues to foment a fierce

Judge puts off decision on whether receiver’s CalPERS benefits are unconstitional

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 20 2013

On January 23, 2008, the federal court appointed J. Clark Kelso as a receiver for California’s prison health care system. In 2011, a taxpayer filed a

CalPERS to consider external investment resource disclosure rule

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 13 2013

Last August the Investment Committee of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) approved revisions to its External Investment

Court orders disclosure of venture capital fund performance

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 8 2013

California's analog to the Freedom of Information Act is the Public Records Act, Government Code 6250 et seq. In enacting the the Public

Court of Appeal sends spot trailer bills to the dog house

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

For some time, I've been critical of that bit of legislative legerdemain known as the "spot bill". See See Spot Run. A spot bill is a bill that is