We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 477

Court orders production of work product documents under crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege where defendants had falsely identified source code

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

In an earlier filed decision, the district court had previously found that Escort and its defense counsel had knowingly misled the plaintiff, Fleming

Court denies motion for extended deposition despite over 300 objections during deposition where Defendant failed to raise issue with objections during the deposition

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2015

In this patent infringement action, the Defendants requested that the court order a further Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of one of the deponents, Mr

The future of inducing infringement claims after Limelight v. Akamai

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

In Limelight v. Akamai, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's precedent holding that inducing infringement claims did not

Smartflash v. Apple: district court excludes damage theory based on survey responses that were insufficient to show that the patented feature alone motivated survey respondents to purchase the accused devices

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 5 2015

Plaintiffs Smartflash LLC and Smartflash Technologies Limited (collectively "Smartflash") filed patent infringement actions against Apple, Inc

District court sanctions defendants for failing to agree to standard protective order

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff filed a motion for entry of a standard protective order after the defendant would not agree to sign

District court holds plaintiff and plaintiff's attorneys jointly and severally liable for attorney's fees and costs after finding that attorneys knew of false affidavits filed with the Patent Office

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

After trial, HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. ("HTC") filed a motion seeking to recover attorney fees and costs from plaintiff's attorneys as

Claims for inducing infringement and contributory infringement dismissed for failure to allege knowledge of patent-in-suit

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 6 2014

Unisone Strategic IP, Inc. ("Unisone") filed a patent infringement action against Tracelink, Inc. ("Tracelink"). Tracelink filed a motion to

Court denies motion to compel deposition testimony on overly broad 30(b)(6) topics and on "contention" topics

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2014

In this patent infringement action brought by Trustees of Boston University ("BU"), BU alleged that defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,686,738

Divorces, community property and patents the problem of the ex-spouse

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 2 2013

Many universities have standard patent assignment agreements that assign inventions of a university employee to the university. But what if the

TiVo raises claims of inequitable conduct that survive dismissal

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 23 2011

TiVo filed a patent infringement action against Verizon and Verizon counterclaimed alleging that TiVo infringed six of its patents