We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 498

District court lifts stay after covered business method review is dismissed because Federal Circuit would not have jurisdiction to hear appeal of dismissal

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2015

Plaintiff GT Nexus, Inc. ("GT Nexus") filed a declaratory judgment action against Inttra, Inc. ("Inttra") seeking a declaration that four of Inttra's

District court grants motion to dismiss for lack of standing on the eve of trial

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

Plaintiff Labyrinth Optical Technologies LLC ("Labyrinth") filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. ("Lucent"

District court denies motion for leave to file summary judgment as premature prior to claim construction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2015

Rec Software USA, Inc. ("Rec") filed a patent infringement action against HTC America, Inc. ("HTC"). HTC requested leave to file a motion for summary

Research in Motion: purported inventor's late-filed lawsuit dooms claim of co-inventorship because laches based on economic prejudice bars the claims

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2012

In this dispute over the inventorship of a patent that is integral to BlackBerry products, the district court held a bench trial on the applicability of laches

The future of inducing infringement claims after Limelight v. Akamai

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

In Limelight v. Akamai, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's precedent holding that inducing infringement claims did not

Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain

District court denies motion for leave to amend answer to assert affirmative defense of patent misuse

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2015

The defendants in this patent infringement action filed several motions for leave to amend their answers to include various affirmative defenses

Divorces, community property and patents the problem of the ex-spouse

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 2 2013

Many universities have standard patent assignment agreements that assign inventions of a university employee to the university. But what if the

Court denies motion to compel deposition testimony on overly broad 30(b)(6) topics and on "contention" topics

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2014

In this patent infringement action brought by Trustees of Boston University ("BU"), BU alleged that defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,686,738

Patent misuse and patent exhaustion asserted as stand alone claims dismissed for failure to state a claim

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2015

Continental Automotive GmbH and Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. (collectively "Continental") filed a multi-claim lawsuit against iBiquity