We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 293

Stay pending inter partes review denied because defendant waited too long to file the petition and court had dedicated resources to determining claim construction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

Defendant Universal Remote Control, Inc. ("Universal Remote") filed a motion to stay a patent infringement action filed by Universal Electronics, Inc

Assignment agreement that failed to specifically address right to sue for past damages held insufficient on summary judgment; summary judgment granted to limit damages to period after patent was acquired

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

Plaintiff Nano-Second Technology filed a patent infringement action against Dynaflex International, GForce Corporation, dba DFX Sports & Fitness

Community property rights of ex-wife impact standing of plaintiff to maintain patent infringement action

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

James R. Taylor ("Taylor") filed a patent infringement action against Taylor Made Inc. ("Taylor Made"). Taylor Made filed a motion to dismiss the

Counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity dismissed as duplicative of infringement complaint and failure to plead any facts describing how the patent was invalid

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

Plaintiff, The Sliding Door Company ("Sliding Door"), brought an action for patent infringement against KLS Doors, LLC ("KLS Doors") alleging

$50 million jury verdict over turned where plaintiff based damage theory on worldwide sales of accused products but only established that "some" of worldwide sales were infringing

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

Promega Corporation ("Promega") filed a patent infringement action against Life Technologies Corporation ("Life Technologies"), among others, over

Apple v. Samsung: a sign of things to come? Court reduces attorneys' fees for both Apple and Samsung for block billing

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 19 2012

The court previously awarded sanctions in the form of attorneys' fees pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 to both Samsung and Apple based on various discovery motions

Universities need to protect their intellectual property: recent decisions from the Federal Circuit and the United States Supreme Court that impact intellectual property agreements

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2013

A number of recent Federal Circuit decisions and a decision from the United States Supreme Court have highlighted the importance of assignment

Acquiring and licensing patents: does the language of your agreement provide you with enforcement rights?

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2013

When acquiring or licensing patents, it is important to consider whether, and to what extent, the acquisition or license conveys the right to enforce

District court stays patent case pending reexamination despite argument that backlog at PTO after America Invents Act would slow reexamination

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 7 2012

Defendants BRP US Inc. and Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. ("Bombardier" or "BRP") filed a motion to stay pending the inter partes reexamination of the patents-in-suit asserted by Polaris Industries, Inc. ("Polaris"

Research in Motion: purported inventor's late-filed lawsuit dooms claim of co-inventorship because laches based on economic prejudice bars the claims

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2012

In this dispute over the inventorship of a patent that is integral to BlackBerry products, the district court held a bench trial on the applicability of laches