We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 423

Adrea v. Barnes & Noble: Court holds that Adrea is precluded from seeking certain past damages for failure to mark

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2014

Adrea, LLC ("Adrea") filed a patent infringement action against Barnes & Noble, Inc., barnesandnoble.com llc, and Nook Media LLC (collectively

Motion to stay pending CBM review granted where non-practicing entity did not seek preliminary injunction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Boku, Inc. ("Boku") filed a CBM petition with the PTAB seeking review of the patentability of Plaintiff's U.S. Patent No. 7,273,168 (the "'168

Permanent injunction granted after jury trial where plaintiff and defendant were competitors and plaintiff's products that embodied patent-in-suit constituted core of plaintiff's business

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 14 2014

After a jury trial in which Power Integrations, Inc. ("Power") obtained a verdict of infringement and validity in its favor against Fairchild

Divorces, community property and patents the problem of the ex-spouse

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 2 2013

Many universities have standard patent assignment agreements that assign inventions of a university employee to the university. But what if the

Apple v. Samsung: the Federal Circuit reverses the district court and sets new standards for obtaining permanent injunctions in patent infringement actions

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2014

As the ongoing war between Apple and Samsung continues, one of the key questions facing both parties is whether Apple can ultimately obtain permanent

Versata v. SAP: stay of $390 million judgment denied even though PTAB found patent invalid

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2014

After the jury returned a verdict of approximately $390 million against SAP and the verdict was affirmed on appeal, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

A sign of things to come? Federal Circuit revives preliminary injunction remedy

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 1 2014

Over the past decade, the ability to obtain a preliminary injunction in a patent case has become more and more difficult, with rulings from the

Inter partes review terminated where PTAB found that challenged claims were indefinite

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2014

Petitioner, BlackBerry Corporation and BlackBerry Limited ("Blackberry"), filed a petition on October 30, 2012, for an inter partes review ("IPR") of

Apple v. Samsung: court denies Samsung's request for discovery based on Apple's alleged disclosure of confidential information

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 2 2014

In the ongoing patent battle between Samsung and Apple, Samsung, trying to turn the tables on Apple, filed a motion for sanctions based on Apple's

Carnegie Mellon v. Marvell: district court denies Marvell's equitable defenses finding that Marvell has not acted equitably toward Carnegie Mellon

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2014

In this patent infringement case brought by Carnegie Mellon University ("CMU"), against Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc