We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 485

Rosebud v. Adobe: district court grants summary judgment of no remedies where plaintiff could not prove actual notice of patent application

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2015

Rosebud filed a patent infringement action Adobe and Adobe moved for summary judgment arguing that Rosebud had no remedy for its patent against Adobe

Smartflash v. Apple: district court excludes damage theory based on survey responses that were insufficient to show that the patented feature alone motivated survey respondents to purchase the accused devices

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 5 2015

Plaintiffs Smartflash LLC and Smartflash Technologies Limited (collectively "Smartflash") filed patent infringement actions against Apple, Inc

District court denies motion to lift stay pending inter partes review even where plaintiff agreed to not pursue claims that were subject to review

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2015

Barco filed a patent infringement action in September 2011 against Defendants Eizo Nanao Corporation and Eizo Nanao Technologies, Inc. ("Eizo"

The future of inducing infringement claims after Limelight v. Akamai

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

In Limelight v. Akamai, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's precedent holding that inducing infringement claims did not

Parent company ordered to produce documents in response to request to subsidiary where parent and subsidiary shared servers and databases

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2014

Plaintiff Dri-Steem Corporation ("Dri-Steem") sought production of documents in the possession and control of the defednant's parent company National

District Court precludes deposition of in-house counsel who acted as part of trial team even though counsel had relevant, non-privileged conversations regarding indemnity

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

After plaintiff, McAirlaids, requested the deposition of one of Kimberly-Clark's ("K-C") in-house litigation counsel, K-C filed a motion for a

Intellectual Ventures v. Symantec: court bifurcates and stays Symantec's patent misuse defense

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2015

Intellectual Ventures ("IV") filed a motion to bifurcate and stay discovery of Symantec's patent misuse defense. The district court agreed with

Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain

Court denies motion to stay pending new inter partes review ("IPR") denied where PTO had previously declined to institute an IPR on asserted claims and trial was rapidly approaching

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 11 2015

The defendant, Samsung, had previously filed IPRs on several of plaintiff's patents, which were granted and denied in part. After the plaintiff

TiVo raises claims of inequitable conduct that survive dismissal

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 23 2011

TiVo filed a patent infringement action against Verizon and Verizon counterclaimed alleging that TiVo infringed six of its patents