We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 433

Motion to stay enforcement of judgment denied where defendant was found to be a willful infringer and offered inadequate security

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 11 2014

On May 16, 2014, the district court entered Judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff Global Traffic Technologies, LLC ("GTT") in the amount

District court denies preliminary injunction where plaintiffs could not show irreparable harm because defendant is large and well established company

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 6 2014

Plaintiff Hill-Rom Company, Inc. ("Hill-Rom") filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against General Electric Company ("GE"). The district court

Claims for inducing infringement and contributory infringement dismissed for failure to allege knowledge of patent-in-suit

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 6 2014

Unisone Strategic IP, Inc. ("Unisone") filed a patent infringement action against Tracelink, Inc. ("Tracelink"). Tracelink filed a motion to

Adrea v. Barnes & Noble: Court holds that Adrea is precluded from seeking certain past damages for failure to mark

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2014

Adrea, LLC ("Adrea") filed a patent infringement action against Barnes & Noble, Inc., barnesandnoble.com llc, and Nook Media LLC (collectively

Motion to set aside default where defendant waited too long to obtain new counsel

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2014

Plaintiff Fleet Engineers, Inc. ("Fleet") develops, manufactures, and sells after-market products for the trucking industry. Defendant Tarun Surti

Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain

Supreme Court's decision on indefiniteness constitutes basis to reconsider prior claim construction order but does not result in change of the claim construction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

In this patent infringement action, Defendant Lighthouse Photonics Corporation's ("Lighthouse") moved to reconsider the Court's Claim Construction

Damage expert's failure to consider non-infringing alternatives justifies summary judgment of no lost profits

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 8 2014

Protegrity Corporation ("Protegrity") filed a patent infringement action against Voltage Security, Inc. ("Voltage")over patents that allegedly cover

GPNE v. Apple: court precludes retention of experts where expert had consulted for Apple's competitors

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2014

Plaintiff GPNE Corporation ("GPNE") filed a patent infringement action against Apple. As part of its case, GPNE wanted to retain two experts, Ghobad

Draft license and settlement agreements carefully: covenant not to sue can bar future litigation on continuation patents

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2011

Covenants not to sue are frequently included in license and settlement agreements. The impact of a covenant not to sue can function similarly to a non-exclusive license and, as a result, the language of the covenant should be carefully drafted to avoid unexpected consequences