We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 458

The future of inducing infringement claims after Limelight v. Akamai

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

In Limelight v. Akamai, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's precedent holding that inducing infringement claims did not

Motion to reconsider Claim Construction Order on indefiniteness after Nautilus denied where district court found term definite

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 17 2014

Defendant Stealth Cam, LLC ("Stealth Cam") requested that the district court reconsider its Claim Construction Order holding that the term "extending

District Court precludes deposition of in-house counsel who acted as part of trial team even though counsel had relevant, non-privileged conversations regarding indemnity

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

After plaintiff, McAirlaids, requested the deposition of one of Kimberly-Clark's ("K-C") in-house litigation counsel, K-C filed a motion for a

Divorces, community property and patents the problem of the ex-spouse

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 2 2013

Many universities have standard patent assignment agreements that assign inventions of a university employee to the university. But what if the

Motion for sanctions based on threats of counsel to reexamine patents and to take other action against outside counsel, although at best "silly posturing and at worst unprofessional," insufficient to justify sanctions because of First Amendment

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2013

Plaintiff Vasudevan Software, Inc. ("VSi") filed a motion for sanctions against defendant MicroStrategy ("MS"). The sanctions motion was based on

A sign of things to come? Federal Circuit revives preliminary injunction remedy

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 1 2014

Over the past decade, the ability to obtain a preliminary injunction in a patent case has become more and more difficult, with rulings from the

Production of billing statements from law firm denied even though deponent could not recall details of why information was not disclosed to PTO

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2014

The defendants in this patent infringement action sought the production of certain billing statements of the law firm representing CleanTech. The

Defendant ordered to provide access to licensee websites

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 12 2014

BNB Health Grades, Inc. ("Health Grades") filed a patent infringement action against MDx Medical, Inc., dba Vitals.com ("MDx"). During the

Laches defense denied where Texas Instruments failed to produce products that demonstrated notice during discovery and Texas Instruments failed to make showing of economic prejudice

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

At the end of trial, the Defendant, Texas Instruments Incorporated's ("TI"), pursued its equitable defense of laches, the only remaining issue left

Fujitsu v. Tellabs: Fujitsu appeal's decision on motion to compel and, after it loses on appeal, district court orders a civil penalty which doubles each day documents are not produced

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

In this patent infringement action, the district court granted a motion to compel filed by Tellabs against Fujitsu. Fujitsu then filed a petition for