We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 448

Fujitsu v. Tellabs: Fujitsu appeal's decision on motion to compel and, after it loses on appeal, district court orders a civil penalty which doubles each day documents are not produced

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

In this patent infringement action, the district court granted a motion to compel filed by Tellabs against Fujitsu. Fujitsu then filed a petition for

Inducing infringement claim dismissed on sua sponte order where alleged infringer did not perform all method steps and did not exercise direction and control

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2014

In this patent infringement action, the district court issued a sua sponte order requiring plaintiff to show why its inducing infringement claims

Laches defense denied where Texas Instruments failed to produce products that demonstrated notice during discovery and Texas Instruments failed to make showing of economic prejudice

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

At the end of trial, the Defendant, Texas Instruments Incorporated's ("TI"), pursued its equitable defense of laches, the only remaining issue left

Court denies motion to compel deposition testimony on overly broad 30(b)(6) topics and on "contention" topics

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2014

In this patent infringement action brought by Trustees of Boston University ("BU"), BU alleged that defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,686,738

Apple v. Samsung sanction decision: the bark is worse than the bite as Apple and Nokia overreach in their request for sanctions

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 3 2014

To resolve Apple and Nokia's request for sanctions against Samsung from Samsung's violation of a protective order, the court ordered written discovery

Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain

Claims for inducing infringement and contributory infringement dismissed for failure to allege knowledge of patent-in-suit

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 6 2014

Unisone Strategic IP, Inc. ("Unisone") filed a patent infringement action against Tracelink, Inc. ("Tracelink"). Tracelink filed a motion to

Carnegie Mellon v. Marvell: district court denies Marvell's equitable defenses finding that Marvell has not acted equitably toward Carnegie Mellon

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2014

In this patent infringement case brought by Carnegie Mellon University ("CMU"), against Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc

Versata v. SAP: stay of $390 million judgment denied even though PTAB found patent invalid

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2014

After the jury returned a verdict of approximately $390 million against SAP and the verdict was affirmed on appeal, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Plaintiff's discovery misconduct leads to award of $800,000 in attorneys' fees

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2011

In a patent infringement action, the district court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment based on the on sale bar and dismissed plaintiff's claims with prejudice