We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
On May 13, 2010, the US District Court for the Southern District of California granted in part and denied in part Verizon Wireless's motion to dismiss a consumer's complaint challenging its practice of charging sales tax on the full retail price of telephones, rather than the actual price paid by the consumer
On April 26, 2012, the Supreme Court of Washington held that AT&T Mobility unlawfully passed through Washington State’s Business & Occupations (B&O) tax onto its wireless customers as a line-item charge on their monthly invoices, rather than factoring the cost into its sales price
