We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 41

Logo, copyright notice and link on web site constitute "copyright management information" under dmca

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 26 2010

The "copyright management" provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 1202, prohibits the provision or dissemination of copyright management information that is false, as well as the removal or alteration of copyright management information

No DMCA or trademark liability for provider of online printing services for removal of material deemed infringing

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

An online printing services provider is not liable for removal of user content that it deems infringing or otherwise objectionable, a district court ruled

Company that distributed P2P software secondarily liable for massive infringement by users

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

A company that created and distributed a peer-to-peer file-sharing program that was used to distribute unauthorized copies of copyrighted music files on a "massive scale" is secondarily liable for acts of direct infringement on the part of the users of the program, a district court ruled

Web site operator’s knowledge of “generalized practice” of copyright infringement insufficient to negate DMCA safe harbor

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

A Web site operator's knowledge of a "generalized practice" of copyright infringement by users of its service is insufficient to deprive it of the protection of the "safe harbor" provided by Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, a district court ruled

No First Amendment violation in statute restoring copyright rights of foreign authors

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

An amendment to the Copyright Act that grants copyright protection to various foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States is not violative of the First Amendment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled

Second Circuit refers question on situs of copyright injury under New York long-arm statute to New York Court of Appeals

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has certfied a question concerning the applicability of the New York long-arm statute to online copyright infringement to the New York State Court of Appeals

Register of copyrights says "who knows?" on ownership of computer program copies

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2010

Who owns the firmware on a smartphone, the device manufacturer or the purchaser?

Ninth Circuit rules on license versus sale of software

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2010

The Register of Copyrights may have concluded that precedents defining the difference between a license and a sale of software are conflicting, but a panel of the Ninth Circuit had no difficulty in resolving the issue in its recent opinion Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS (9th Cir. Sept. 10, 2010

Browsewrap attorney fee provision between business parties violates Ohio public policy

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2010

An attorney fee provision in a browsewrap license agreement between commercial parties is unenforceable under Ohio law, even though a jury found that the agreement had been breached, because the attorney fee provision was not the product of "free and understanding negotiation," a district court ruled

No CFAA violation where software licensor with administrative password gave server access to licensor's competitor

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2010

Neither a software licensee, nor a competitor of the software licensor, violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act when the competitor accessed a server containing the licensor's proprietary files via a password supplied by the licensee who had been issued an administrative password by the licensor, a district court ruled