We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 38

No CFAA violation where software licensor with administrative password gave server access to licensor's competitor

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2010

Neither a software licensee, nor a competitor of the software licensor, violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act when the competitor accessed a server containing the licensor's proprietary files via a password supplied by the licensee who had been issued an administrative password by the licensor, a district court ruled

Oracle v. Google judge writes the book on software programming copyright for now, anyway

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2012

The trial in the dispute between Oracle and Google over the use of Java technology in the Android operating system is over, and the greatly anticipated ruling on copyright in the Java Application Programming Interface (API) has issued

Mobile carriers not secondarily liable for copyright infringement on multimedia messaging system

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 5 2011

Mobile carriers are not liable for inducing infringement of copyright on their multimedia messaging system because they did not design the system with the object of promoting infringement, nor did they take any specific, affirmative steps to actively encourage or induce infringement by users of the system, a district court ruled in a copyright infringement action brought by a producer of multimedia messaging content

Register of copyrights says "who knows?" on ownership of computer program copies

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2010

Who owns the firmware on a smartphone, the device manufacturer or the purchaser?

European Court of Justice rules on copyright status of computer programming languages and functionality

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • May 7 2012

In a jury room in San Francisco, jurors in Oracle, Inc. v. Google, Inc. have been toiling over complicated issues related to the copyrightability of the Java computer programming language, and they may well return a verdict before the ink is dry on this post

Novell prevails in long-running dispute over ownership of UNIX copyrights - and open source software moves on

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2011

The dispute between The SCO Group and Novell, Inc. over the ownership of copyrights in the code to certain versions of the UNIX operating system, which started eight years ago, appears to have been handed its retirement papers by the Tenth Circuit

Posting entire news article on nonprofit organization's blog constitutes fair use

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 5 2011

The re-posting of an entire news article on the blog of a nonprofit organization is fair use as a matter of law where the purpose was to educate the public, a district court ruled

The Righthaven lawsuits: what is fair use of online publications?

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2011

Righthaven LLC is an intellectual property enforcement firm that was formed by a group of copyright attorneys and Stephens Media, the publisher of the Law Vegas Review-Journal

Software licensor's contract prohibition against automated download of support materials does not constitute copyright misuse

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2011

A prohibition in a software license agreement against the use of automated tools to download support materials related to the software is not a misuse of copyright, a district court found

No DMCA or trademark liability for provider of online printing services for removal of material deemed infringing

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

An online printing services provider is not liable for removal of user content that it deems infringing or otherwise objectionable, a district court ruled