We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 112

CDA Section 230 protects web site operator from liability for user's defamatory post, despite general statement on web site concerning accuracy of information

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

A general statement on a Web site to the effect that posted information was truthful and accurate did not deprive the Web site operators of protection from liability for defamatory statements posted by third parties under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a Texas appeals court ruled

Despite liability disclaimer, domain name registrar may be liable for social engineering hack of domain name

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2010

A domain name registrar may be liable for damages sustained by a search engine as a result of a social engineering exploit that enabled a hacker to obtain control of the search engine's domain name and redirect traffic to the hacker's political site, a district court ruled

ECPA not applicable to ISP's alleged disclosure of communications to foreign government

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2010

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act does not apply to the actions of an ISP that allegedly revealed subscribers' personal information and communications to a foreign government, where the acts of disclosure and interception took place in a foreign country, a district court ruled

Forum selection clause in Google AdWords agreement applies to claims against Google for prior conduct

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2010

The scope of the forum selection clause in the agreement applicable to the Google Adwords program extends to a plaintiff's dispute with Google over conduct predating the execution of the Adwords agreement, a district court ruled

California anti-spam statute not preempted by federal CAN-SPAM Act

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2010

Claims under California Business & Professions Code Section 17529.5, the California anti-spam statute, are not preempted by the federal CAN-SPAM Act, a district court ruled

CDA 230 protects blog owner from liability for third-party comment

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 5 2011

The court ruled the owner of a blog is not liable for an alleged defamatory comment even if the owner viewed and approved the comment prior to publication on the blog

Fed. R. Civ. p. 65 precludes post-judgment injunction requiring web site to remove user's defamatory post

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2010

The requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 preclude the enforcement of an injunction requiring the removal of posts found to be defamatory against a Web site operator that was not a party to the defamation litigation in which the judgment including the injunction was issued, a district court ruled

E-mail may satisfy writing requirement under New York real estate Statute of Frauds

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2011

An e-mail may be sufficient to satisfy the New York real estate Statute of Frauds requirement that a conveyance or contract concerning real property be in writing, a New York appellate court ruled

License language in contract may render search ad provider liable under ACPA for providing ads to parked domain names

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

A provider of search ads to registrants of parked domain names alleged to infringe trademarks may be liable under the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act as an "authorized licensee" of the registrants, a district court ruled

No dismissal under CDA Section 230 for ISP where good faith is challenged

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

An Internet service provider is not entitled to dismissal of a complaint alleging various theories of liability for blocking e-mails alleged to be spam, where the plaintiff's complaint called into question whether the ISP acted in good faith pursuant to Section 230 (c)(2) of the Communications Decency Act, a district court ruled