We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Across the pond simple confidentiality agreement destroys Stanford University’s rights in lucrative HIV testing kits

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • August 17 2011

In the United States, the Bayh-Dole Act vests patent rights from federally funded research in the university where the research is carried out, rather than in the individual researchers

Toronto pronto

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • August 12 2010

For a number of years patent offices around the world have been struggling with the slow pace of getting patents granted

... although the US Patent and Trademark Office sticks to its guns

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 12 2010

One problem with not rewriting the words of statutes is that patent offices then find that they have to apply the original words - which was the difficulty which often led to using some alternative formulation

... and the US Supreme Court reaches a similar view ...

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 12 2010

In In re Bilski the Supreme Court in the USA was asked to consider a parallel, equally topical question: Are business methods patentable in the USA?