We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 55

Heyday: why you're wrong to be relieved

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 25 2008

Even before the Age Regulations 2006 came into force, Heyday issued a High Court challenge to the provisions which allow mandatory retirement at age 65

"Over stickered" and re-boxed parallel imports are to be treated the same way

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 11 2007

In the latest judgment given in the protracted UK litigation between several big pharma companies including the Boehringer and Glaxo groups against various parallel importers, the ECJ has given additional guidance which will disappoint parallel importers and be broadly welcomed by trade mark owners (Case C-34804

CFI confirms no in-house lawyer privilege for EC competition investigations

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 26 2007

On 17 September 2007 the Court of First Instance (CFI) gave its judgment in Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v EC of the European Communities

Response from Wragge & Co LLP to the consultation on the review of the Vertical Restraints Block Exemption (VRBE) Regulation and guidelines

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 30 2009

The amendment to the so-called 'safe harbour' threshold to include both the supplier's and the buyer's respective shares of 'any relevant market affected by the agreement' is a radical change to the existing VRBE

Is eBay an IP pirate or merely the unaware ocean over which such pirates may sail?

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 11 2009

In the rush to respond to the UK courts' first judgment considering the potential liability of eBay for trade mark infringement, many commentators have published accounts which may be misleading

The Heyday saga: back from Europe

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 6 2009

Even before the Age Regulations came into force, Heyday issued a High Court challenge to the provisions which allow mandatory retirement at age 65

Energy Performance of Buildings - proposals to amend the legislation on Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs), Display Energy Certificates (DECs) and air-conditioning inspections

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 10 2009

The European Commission has published proposals to amend the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive

Court of Appeal and ECJ beg to differ on legality of shared service arrangements: Brent LBC v Risk Management Partners (the LAML case) and Commission v Germany

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 16 2009

On 9 June 2009, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Brent LBC v Risk Management Partners, upholding the insurance provider's claim for damages for breach of the procurement rules

Implemention of “Bolar” in the EU

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 31 2007

In Europe, Directive 200427EC (amending Directive 200183EC) introduced into European Union legislation for the first time an exemption from patent infringement for conducting certain developmental work pre-patent expiry (the EU ‘Bolar’ exemption

Big boost for brands

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 18 2009

In a dispute concerning downmarket fragrances intended to be smell-a-likes for several of L'Oreal's famous perfumes, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has provided guidance to the UK Court of Appeal which will be welcomed by many brand owners