We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,615

No independent procedural duty to accommodate under Canadian Human Rights Act: Federal Court of Appeal

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 24 2014

A recent decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v Canada (Attorney General) (Cruden) has suggested that there is

Banks and provincial consumer protection laws the Supreme Court of Canada weighs in

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 22 2014

On September 19, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its long-awaited judgment in Marcotte v. Bank of Montreal et al. And clarified the

McDonald’s, and not just its franchisees, liable for worker treatment says National Labor Relations Board: should Canadian franchisors be concerned?

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • September 22 2014

The General Counsel of the United States' National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently ruled that McDonald's should be considered a joint employer

Ontario’s Court of Appeal affirms principles of contractual interpretation and the standard of review in contractual disputes

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 22 2014

On September 10, 2014, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released a decision applying the Supreme Court of Canada's recent ruling dealing with

Dismissal without hearing of human rights complaint upheld by Ontario court

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 22 2014

In Gill v Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Ontario Divisional Court concluded that it is appropriate for the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

Cultivating fear the Marsh v Baxter effect

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 19 2014

In the previous issue of Cultivate, we discussed Australia’s first organic v GM legal battle, Marsh v Baxter. The dispute, between an organic farm

Government wage restraint legislation upheld

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 24 2014

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has affirmed that the federal government did not violate unionized employee's freedom of association by

P&E court updates - July 2014

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 16 2014

This was an application for leave to appeal against Council’s decision to approve a development proposal advanced by Trinity Green Development Pty

Seller beware! The buyer may use your own privileged documents against you in a court of law

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • September 12 2014

The law of evidence in Quebec draws heavily on common law. Case law from courts in the rest of Canada and in the United States relating to

The folly of a press release

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 26 2014

Madden had falsely accused Seafolly of copying her designs. However, an unresolved part of that dispute concerned a series of misleading social media