We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 105

Hong Kong courts consider the mediation-arbitration procedure

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Hong Kong
  • -
  • June 8 2011

In Gao Hai Yan v Keeneye Holdings Ltd 2011 HKEC 514, the enforcement in Hong Kong of a mainland arbitral award that was rendered (in China) following failed settlement efforts in a mediator-arbitrator ('med-arb') process was challenged on public policy grounds

Australia: at what stage is it appropriate for the court to refer cases to ADR?

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 19 2012

The types of disputes that are amenable to ADR are of course not unlimited

Pros and cons of common ADR processes

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 2 2012

We set out in this document a short discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of some of the most common dispute resolution processes under the

Parties cannot avoid Commercial Agents Regulations by choice of non-EU law and arbitration

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 29 2010

In Accentuate v Asigra 2009 EWHC 2655 (QB) the English High Court held it had jurisdiction to hear a claim for compensation under the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, even though the relevant agreement was subject to a choice of Canadian law and arbitration and the Canadian arbitral tribunal had already ruled against the claim

Approaches to ADR in arbitration and litigation proceedings

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Africa
  • -
  • September 22 2012

We asked local counsel in 21 African jurisdictions whether parties to litigation or arbitration were required to consider or submit to alternative dispute resolution procedures before or during proceedings

Changes to the Industrial Relations Act in Singapore allow employees to pursue mediation

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • June 8 2011

On 1 February 2011 amendments to the Industrial Relations Act were brought into force in Singapore

CEDR rules for the facilitation of settlement of international arbitration

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • February 25 2010

On 26 November 2009, at a conference chaired by Lord Woolf, CEDR launched its rules for the facilitation of settlement in international arbitration

Creation of ADR framework for financial services in Japan

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Japan
  • -
  • February 25 2010

"The Law Concerning the Promotion of the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures" (the "ADR Promotion Law") was promulgated on 1 December 2004 and came into effect on 1 April 2007

Alternative dispute resolution e-bulletin

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 17 2012

Welcome to our first ADR e-bulletin of 2012

Responses to government's consultation on Solving Disputes in the County Courts

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 6 2011

The new Dispute Resolution Commitment is the latest in a series of government moves to encourage the use of ADR mechanisms, including negotiation, mediation and neutral evaluation