We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Food: to be or not to be!

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Germany
  • -
  • July 21 2010

The German Federal Court of Justice has passed a cornerstone decision by its judgment dated 14 January 2010, case I ZR 13807, relating to the differentiation of foodstuff and medicines in borderline cases

Medical products: to be or not to be?

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Germany
  • -
  • July 28 2010

The German Federal Court of Justice has given a key decision in its judgment of 14 January 2010 (Case I ZR 13807) relating to the differentiation of foodstuffs and medicinal products in borderline cases

The German “dioxin incident”

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Germany
  • -
  • February 9 2011

Since December 2010 there have been several media reports on dioxin in animal feed in Germany