We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 602

Post-contract amendments: the old world and the new world

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 19 2015

The extent to which you can amend contracts after signature is one of the most grey areas in public procurement. The European Court of Justice's

English High Court confirms enforceability of post termination restrictions against former franchisee

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 28 2015

On Friday 23 January 2015 in the case of Oven Clean Domestic Limited v Read the High Court in London confirmed that a fairly standard post termination

Jurisdiction Lodge v Dignity & Choice in Dying and another

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 28 2015

An employee who voluntarily moved to Australia and worked there remotely for four and a half years was entitled to bring claims in the UK Employment

Payments for new restrictive covenants

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 28 2015

A company could not enforce restrictive covenants against a former employee where there had been inadequate consideration given for their

Social media and Game Retail Ltd v Laws UKEAT

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 28 2015

The EAT has held that a dismissal for offensive tweets by an employee on his personal Twitter feed was potentially fair and that a tribunal had

TUPE London Borough of Hillingdon v Anne Gormanley and others

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 28 2015

The Employment Tribunal erred in finding that a group of managerial employees were assigned to an organised grouping that transferred under TUPE. In

Subjective intention required to infringe Swiss form claims

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 27 2015

Mr Justice Arnold refused Warner Lambert Company LLC's request for an injunction against Actavis Group PTC EHF's pregabalin product, which Actavis

Topshop's sale of Rihanna t-shirt was unlawful, agrees the Court of Appeal

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 22 2015

The Court of Appeal has today handed down its judgment in Robyn Rihanna Fenty & Ots v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd & Anr ("Topshop"), concerning

BrandWrites - December 2014

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • European Union, France, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 3 2014

A 3D trade mark in relation to a new unique product idea could in theory have been a way to achieve a monopoly on the market. However, while the

Must-have v. nice-to-have how much information triggers the start of competition damages time limits?

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 1 2014

A victim of an infringement of competition law such as a cartel understandably wishes to have as much information as possible about the infringement