Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Regulation 8(7) and 'pre-pack' administrations
- Bird & Bird
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- November 18 2009
Last year, in the case of Oakland v Wellswood (Yorkshire) Ltd, the EAT suggested that, if an administrator has been appointed with a view to liquidating a transferor company, this fell within the exception provided by TUPE Regulation 8(7) (which provides that where there are insolvency proceedings instituted with a view to liquidation, the key employee protections afforded under TUPE do not apply
Employee status
- Bird & Bird
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- May 14 2009
When a company goes into insolvent liquidation, its employees are given a limited degree of protection from the immediate adverse financial consequences for them as individuals
Protective award
- Bird & Bird
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- July 10 2008
A protective award for failure to consult employees on redundancy becomes a contingent liability payable by the liquidator when the company employer subsequently becomes insolvent
Were dismissals by an administrator made for economic reasons (and therefore fair) or TUPE-related and automatically unfair?
- Bird & Bird
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- May 13 2008
In Dynamex Friction Ltd v Amicus an administrator had dismissed the entire workforce immediately on being appointed because the company had no money to pay its debts
Current Search
- Firm Name - Bird & Bird
- Jurisdiction - United Kingdom
- Workarea - Employment & Labor
- Workarea - Insolvency & Restructuring