We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

Unilever plc & others v Shanks: employee invention compensation to be measured by reference to actual benefits to employer rather than hypothetical benefits

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 31 2011

The Court of Appeal (Longmore and Jacob LJJ and Kitchin J) recently addressed (2010 EWCA Civ 1283) the meaning of the words "that person" in section 41(2) Patents Act 1977 in the context of a long-running dispute over an inventor's entitlement to compensation from his employer where the patent has been of outstanding benefit to the employer

First successful UK application by inventors for employee compensation: Kelly & Chiu v GE Healthcare Limited

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 11 2009

In a judgment handed down on 11 February 2009 Mr Justice Floyd held that two of the inventors of two patent families relating to the radioactive imaging agent Myoview were entitled to compensation under section 40 of the Patents Act 1977