We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 56

No failure to make adjustments ‘by association’

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 1 2014

In Hainsworth v Ministry of Defence, the Court of Appeal considered an employee who was not herself disabled, but who had a daughter with Down's

Update to flexible working

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 30 2014

From 30 June, the right to make a statutory flexible working request has been extended to all employees. The right was previously only available to

Injunction - to compel performance of an employment contract?

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 16 2014

The case of Ashworth v Royal National Theatre was unusual in that the claimants were professional musicians working on the long-running play 'War

Key revisions to UK employment law effective 6 April 2014

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 7 2014

ACAS is now able to offer optional Early Conciliation to help to settle a dispute without going to tribunal. For claims lodged on or after 6 May 2014

Collective redundancies - consultation requirement update

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 3 2014

The long-running case of Nolan v USA has been referred back to the Court of Appeal (CA) from the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), but still no

Discrimination - liability for acts of agent

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 3 2014

In Kemeh v Ministry of Defence, the Court of Appeal (CA) considered the claim of an employee who was racially abused by an agency worker working at

Regulations only apply to ‘temporary’ workers

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 2 2014

In Moran and others v Ideal Cleaning Services and Celanese Acetate, the EAT considered the case of several claimants who were employed by the first

Injunction - to enforce 'garden leave' clause

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 5 2013

In J M Finn & Co v Holliday, the High Court considered the case of a Claimant whose contract provided for a 12 month notice period and allowed the

‘Cured’ by successful internal appeal

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 24 2013

In Little v Richmond Pharmacology, the Employment Appeal Tribunal considered the case of a female employee whose request to work part-time on her

One person can be an ‘organised grouping of employees’

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 24 2013

In Rynda (UK) Ltd v Rhijnsburger, the EAT considered the case of a claimant who provided office management services. She worked on her own, managing