We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 30

Judgment showcases competition risk in M&A transactions

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • April 11 2013

A recent European Court of Justice judgment showcases the uncertainties and exposure faced by both the buyer and seller of a business, should

Selective distribution: reaffirmation of the illegality of an internet sales ban

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • March 28 2013

Through two recent decisions, the French Competition Authority and the Paris Court of Appeal, both applying the analysis grid set by the European

Commission consults on tighter rules on technology transfer agreements

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • February 28 2013

The European Commission has published its long-awaited proposals to overhaul the Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation,(1) which provides a

2013: what to expect on the European competition policy front

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • February 4 2013

At the outset of 2012, we described the first two years of EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia's mandate as an era of "quiet but efficient"

BIS to implement collective action regime for anti-trust claimants

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 30 2013

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) today published a keenly anticipated statement giving its conclusions on an April 2012

Annual digest 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 13 2012

2012 has been an eventful sporting year, and while it may be hyperbole to argue that the drama of the arbitration rooms of Lausanne matched London's Olympic Stadium, the anti-doping movement has come under increased pressure this year

Regulatory & public law group annual digest 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 13 2012

2012 has been an eventful sporting year, and while it may be hyperbole to argue that the drama of the arbitration rooms of Lausanne matched London's

The Supreme Court confirms when the limitation period starts to run in follow-on damages claims

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 19 2012

In BCL Old Co Limited and Others v. BASF plc and Others 2012 UKSC 45, the Supreme Court, in its first competition damages case, confirmed that the two-year limitation period to bring a follow-on damages claim begins to run from the date on which the regulator's infringement decision becomes final

Canadian Competition Bureau announces criminal charges for breach of consent agreement

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 31 2012

On September 11, 2012, the Canadian Competition Bureau (“CCB”) announced that it filed criminal charges under Canada’s Competition Act (the “Act”) against Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd. and its subsidiary, BFI Canada Inc., for alleged breaches of a June 2010 consent agreement entered into with the CCB (the “Consent Agreement”

AUO ordered to pay $500 million fine for criminal price-fixing and two top executives sentenced to three years in prison and to pay $200,000

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2012

A jury found that AU Optronics Corporation (“AUO”), Taiwan’s second-largest LCD producer, plus its Houston-based subsidiaryAU Optronics Corporation America (“AUOA”) and two former top executives, H.B. Chen and Hui Hsiung, participated in a criminal conspiracy to fix the price of LCD panels sold worldwide

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy