We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 42

US Court of Appeals holds NLRB lacks authority to act

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2013

US employers continue to face uncertainty and increased risk due to decisions and enforcement actions by governmental agencies, including the

Wage and hour quarterly newsletter - 3rd quarter 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 31 2012

As reported last quarter, in June, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham that pharmaceutical sales representatives

MacDermid, Inc. v. Deiter, 702 F.3d 725 (2d Cir. 2012)

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • March 25 2013

Plaintiff MacDermid Chemicals ("MacDermid"), a Connecticut company, decided to terminate the employment of Defendant Jackie Deiter, who worked and

Harrisson v NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., No. 11-12179 (11th Cir. Aug. 22, 2012)

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2013

Erikson Harrisson was a former employee of NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. (“NCL”). Following an injury sustained at work, Harrisson sued NCL in Florida state

2011 in review and 2012 challenges

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 10 2012

In this update, we identify top labor and employment developments in the U.S. and offer proactive tips to help employers plan for compliance challenges in 2012

Employee has reasonable expectation of privacy in emails sent on work computer

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 5 2010

The New Jersey (NJ) Supreme Court decided a novel question about the extent to which an employee can expect privacy and confidentiality in personal emails with her attorney, which emails the employee accessed on a computer owned by her employer

Going out with a bang: at term's end, Supreme Court rewrites employment standards

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 3 2009

In two recent cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has sharply redefined how certain types of employment discrimination lawsuits must proceed

NLRB’s decisional authority challenged, pending federal labor legislation, and union organizing outcomes for 2008

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2009

In 1947, the Taft-Hartley amendments to the 1935 National Labor Relations Act expanded the number of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) members from three to five

United States employer update 2009 in review

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2010

2009 was a roller-coaster year for U.S. employers

Pennsylvania court allows FMLA claims against individual managers to proceed

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2010

A recent decision by a Pennsylvania federal district court underscores the need for Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) compliance training for executives, managers, supervisors, and HR professionals