Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 791

When are employees "affected employees" for the purposes of TUPE consultation?

Baker & McKenzie
-
United Kingdom
-
June 5 2013

The EAT has concluded that employees working in part of an undertaking that did not transfer were not "affected employees" for the purposes of an

Limitation on claims in UK by employees working overseas

Baker & McKenzie
-
United Kingdom
-
June 5 2013

The EAT has held that a Tribunal wrongly approached the issue of whether an employee who was employed by a UK company, but who lived and worked in

Continental Cas. Co. v. Argentine Republic, No. 1:12cv99, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129535 (E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2012)

Baker & McKenzie
-
Argentina, USA
-
March 25 2013

Plaintiff Continental Casualty Company brought suit against Defendant the Argentine Republic ("Argentina") in the Eastern District of Virginia seeking

Verbal commitment to 400m bonus pool was legally binding

Baker & McKenzie
-
United Kingdom
-
June 5 2013

The Court of Appeal has confirmed that a verbal announcement of a guaranteed 400m bonus pool was legally binding. The Court also held that even

Who decides arbitrability?

Baker & McKenzie
-
USA
-
November 30 2012

Arbitration cannot take place in the absence of an agreement to arbitrate, but it is not always clear which particular disputes were intended by the parties to be heard in arbitration

Collective redundancy consultation: when, who and what?

Baker & McKenzie
-
United Kingdom
-
June 5 2013

The EAT has given guidance on various issues relating to collective redundancy consultation. It has emphasised that where an employer elects to

Second Circuit affirms district court’s order compelling compliance with subpoenas duces tecum served on two non-party banks, holding that the subpoenas do not infringe on Argentina’s sovereign immunity

Baker & McKenzie
-
USA
-
November 30 2012

In December 2001, defendant Republic of Argentina (“Argentina”) defaulted on payment of its external debt

A resignation letter can be withdrawn on the last day of notice

Baker & McKenzie
-
Russia
-
February 11 2013

The employee intended to resign on a particular date and filed a letter of resignation and then took sick leave until the date of dismissal. Whilst

Bell appeal judgment delivered

Baker & McKenzie
-
Australia
-
August 17 2012

The Western Australian Court of Appeal has today delivered its judgment in the appeal of Westpac Banking Corporation v The Bell Group Ltd (in Liq) 2012 WASCA 157 ( The Bell Appeal

Standard Chartered Bank v. Ahmad Hamad Al Gosaibi & Bros. Co., 957 N.Y.S.2d 602 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County 2012)

Baker & McKenzie
-
Bahrain, USA
-
March 25 2013

Plaintiff Standard Chartered Bank sued Defendants, a Saudi Arabian partnership and its partners (all residents and citizens of Saudi Arabia), in New

next >

Search results

When are employees "affected employees" for the purposes of TUPE consultation?

Limitation on claims in UK by employees working overseas

Continental Cas. Co. v. Argentine Republic, No. 1:12cv99, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129535 (E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2012)

Verbal commitment to 400m bonus pool was legally binding

Who decides arbitrability?

Collective redundancy consultation: when, who and what?

Second Circuit affirms district court’s order compelling compliance with subpoenas duces tecum served on two non-party banks, holding that the subpoenas do not infringe on Argentina’s sovereign immunity

A resignation letter can be withdrawn on the last day of notice

Bell appeal judgment delivered

Standard Chartered Bank v. Ahmad Hamad Al Gosaibi & Bros. Co., 957 N.Y.S.2d 602 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County 2012)

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea