We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 22

Secured lending in Canada

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 2 2013

On February 1, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada released the long-anticipated decision in Re Indalex 2013 SCC 61. The most significant aspect of

MacDermid, Inc. v. Deiter, 702 F.3d 725 (2d Cir. 2012)

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • March 25 2013

Plaintiff MacDermid Chemicals ("MacDermid"), a Connecticut company, decided to terminate the employment of Defendant Jackie Deiter, who worked and

Canada’s top court rules that wiretap laws apply to text messages stored by a mobile carrier

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 15 2013

On March 27, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada (the "Court") released an important decision allowing an appeal by a Canadian wireless carrier to

Canadian Competition Bureau announces criminal charges for breach of consent agreement

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 31 2012

On September 11, 2012, the Canadian Competition Bureau (“CCB”) announced that it filed criminal charges under Canada’s Competition Act (the “Act”) against Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd. and its subsidiary, BFI Canada Inc., for alleged breaches of a June 2010 consent agreement entered into with the CCB (the “Consent Agreement”

Global guide to competition litigation

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • October 1 2012

Competition litigation is a fast growing and complex area of commercial litigation that often requires coordination of strategy across jurisdictions

Supreme Court of Canada to rule on whether ISPs can be regulated under the Broadcasting Act

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 28 2011

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has granted leave to appeal a Federal Court of Appeal judgment dated 7 July 2010, which held that internet service providers (ISPs) do not carry on a "broadcasting undertaking" as defined in the federal Broadcasting Act

Telecommunications firms litigate internet speed advertising claims

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 30 2009

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has denied a request for an injunction by Bell Canada, the largest Canadian internet service provider, but has made important comments on the merits of an underlying action relating to comparative advertising of internet speed claims

Alcohol and drug testing in the union context

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 28 2009

Canadian employers who plan to unilaterally impose stiffer drug and alcohol testing requirements on unionized workers should take note of a March 2009 Alberta Court of Appeal decision, United Assn. Of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 488 v. Bantrel Constructors Co

Court certifies overtime class action

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 23 2010

In a decision released on February 19, 2010, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice certified a multi-million dollar class action lawsuit brought by a sales employee alleging that the Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") failed to pay overtime to current and former sales employees, whose duties and responsibilities involve selling a variety of Scotiabank's products, including mortgages, credit cards, lines of credits, and RRSPs, to Scotiabank's customers

Canadian appeals court rules internet service providers are not broadcasters

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 6 2010

The Federal Court of Appeal (Court) has confirmed that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are not broadcasters