We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 98

6-year time limit for equal pay claims

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 21 2012

The Supreme Court has confirmed that employees may bring equal pay claims in the civil courts, even where they would be out of time to bring those claims in the Employment Tribunal

When is an agent not an agent?

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 29 2013

In multi-party arrangements, the question of who the supplier(s) of a service is and who acts as an agent is fundamental for VAT purposes. The recent

Contingency fees are in, CFA success fees and recovery of ATE premiums are out

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 9 2012

Lord Jackson's long awaited litigation funding reforms have finally been enacted

Global guide to competition litigation

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • October 1 2012

Competition litigation is a fast growing and complex area of commercial litigation that often requires coordination of strategy across jurisdictions

The Supreme Court confirms when the limitation period starts to run in follow-on damages claims

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 19 2012

In BCL Old Co Limited and Others v. BASF plc and Others 2012 UKSC 45, the Supreme Court, in its first competition damages case, confirmed that the two-year limitation period to bring a follow-on damages claim begins to run from the date on which the regulator's infringement decision becomes final

Pension scheme trustees succeed in battle to open secondary insolvency proceedings against bankrupt Greek airline

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 11 2012

In October 2009 the Greek airline, Olympic Airlines SA ("OA"), entered "special liquidation" in Greece after the European Commission ordered it to repay illegal state aid from the Greek Government

The Wheels case: DB schemes and common investment funds are not exempt from VAT on investment management fees

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 2 2013

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has decided following lengthy proceedings that defined benefit (DB) occupational pension schemes (and common

Spreadex: don't gamble with your T&Cs

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 27 2012

A High Court judge has refused the spread betting company Spreadex permission to recover £50,000 in losses accrued on a customer's account unless it could show that the trades were made by the customer himself or with his actual or ostensible authority, despite a contrary clause in the customer agreement

Contractual pensions promise interpreted restrictively

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 12 2012

The High Court has taken a restrictive approach to the interpretation of contractual pension promises in the recent case of In the Matter of Sea Containers Services Ltd ("SCSL") and Others

Foreign tax relief and hybrid entities - the Bayfine case

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 1 2010

The recent decision of the UK High Court, overturning a decision of the Special Commissioners (the former first-tier tax appeals court in the UK), in Bayfine UK v HMRC 2010 EWHC 609 provides an interesting insight into the interpretation of the UKUS double tax treaty in the context of "hybrid" entities, ie UK tax resident companies that are disregarded for US tax purposes